Cristóbal Quevedo Ignacio, Cristóbal García Ignacio, Gracia Myriam, Garcia-Pineda Virginia, Alonso-Espias Maria, Siegrist Jaime, Diestro Maria Dolores, Hernández Alicia, Zapardiel Ignacio
Gynecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Gynecology Department, San Carlos Clinic Hospital, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 18;13(2):170. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020170.
The main objective was to analyze the rate of bilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in endometrial cancer using indocyanine green (ICG) as a unique tracer compared to Technetium99 + ICG. As secondary objectives, we analyzed the drainage pattern and factors that might affect the oncological outcomes. A case-control ambispective study was carried out on consecutive patients at our center. Data on the SLN biopsy with ICG collected prospectively were compared to retrospective data on the use of a double-tracer technique including Technetium99 + ICG. In total, 194 patients were enrolled and assigned to both groups, in which the group with both tracers (controls) included 107 (54.9%) patients and the ICG-alone group (cases) included 87 (45.1%) patients. The rate of bilateral drainage was significantly higher in the ICG group (98.9% vs. 89.7%; = 0.013). The median number of nodes retrieved was higher in the control group (three vs. two nodes; < 0.01). We did not find survival differences associated with the tracer used ( = 0.85). We showed significant differences in terms of disease-free survival regarding the SLN location ( < 0.01), and obturator fossa retrieved nodes showed better prognosis compared to external iliac. The use of ICG as a single tracer for SLN detection in endometrial cancer patients seemed to obtain higher rates of bilateral detection with similar oncological outcomes.
主要目的是分析与锝99 +吲哚菁绿(ICG)相比,使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)作为唯一示踪剂在子宫内膜癌中双侧前哨淋巴结(SLN)的检测率。作为次要目的,我们分析了引流模式以及可能影响肿瘤学结局的因素。在我们中心对连续的患者进行了一项病例对照双向研究。将前瞻性收集的ICG前哨淋巴结活检数据与使用包括锝99 + ICG的双示踪技术的回顾性数据进行比较。总共194例患者被纳入并分为两组,其中使用两种示踪剂的组(对照组)包括107例(54.9%)患者,仅使用ICG的组(病例组)包括87例(45.1%)患者。ICG组双侧引流率显著更高(98.9%对89.7%;P = 0.013)。对照组回收的淋巴结中位数更高(三个对两个淋巴结;P < 0.01)。我们未发现与所用示踪剂相关的生存差异(P = 0.85)。我们发现前哨淋巴结位置在无病生存方面存在显著差异(P < 0.01),与髂外淋巴结相比,闭孔窝回收的淋巴结预后更好。在子宫内膜癌患者中使用ICG作为前哨淋巴结检测的单一示踪剂似乎能获得更高的双侧检测率,且肿瘤学结局相似。