• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抱怨疼痛的时间:一项关于 Hall 技术和传统不锈钢冠技术的随机对照试验中,儿童自我报告的操作疼痛。

Time to complain about pain: Children's self-reported procedural pain in a randomised control trial of Hall and conventional stainless steel crown techniques.

机构信息

Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jul;33(4):382-393. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13059. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

DOI:10.1111/ipd.13059
PMID:36841968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children's pain in dentistry has undesirable short- and long-term consequences; therefore, less invasive treatments merit consideration.

AIM

To investigate procedural pain scores for two treatments for carious primary molars in New Zealand primary care.

DESIGN

This study was a split-mouth randomised control trial, with secondary outcome analysis. Children (4-8 years) with proximal carious lesions on matched primary molars had one tooth treated with the Hall technique (HT) and one treated with a conventional stainless steel crown (CT); treatment type and order of treatment were randomly allocated (allocation concealment). The Wong-Baker self-report pain scale measured pretreatment dental pain, procedural pain at each treatment and post-operative pain.

RESULTS

Data were analysed for 103 children: 49 children had the HT first and 54 children had the CT first. Procedural pain scores did not differ by treatment type, with 71.8% and 76.7% of children reporting low pain for the HT and the CT, respectively. Fewer children reported low procedural pain for the second treatment than the first (p = .047). Most children reported low procedural pain for both treatments (58.3%), although 41.7% experienced moderate-high procedural pain with at least one treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The HT caused pain for as many children as the CT. There is an opportunity for better dental pain management in this setting.

摘要

背景

儿童在牙科的疼痛会带来短期和长期的不良后果;因此,值得考虑采用侵入性更小的治疗方法。

目的

调查新西兰初级保健中两种治疗龋齿乳磨牙的方法的操作疼痛评分。

设计

这是一项分侧随机对照试验,具有次要结局分析。有近中龋损的匹配乳磨牙的 4-8 岁儿童,一侧牙齿采用 Hall 技术(HT)治疗,另一侧采用常规不锈钢冠(CT)治疗;治疗类型和治疗顺序随机分配(分配隐藏)。Wong-Baker 自我报告疼痛量表测量治疗前、每次治疗时的操作疼痛和术后疼痛。

结果

对 103 名儿童进行了数据分析:49 名儿童先接受 HT,54 名儿童先接受 CT。操作疼痛评分不因治疗类型而异,HT 和 CT 的低疼痛报告率分别为 71.8%和 76.7%。第二次治疗比第一次治疗报告低操作疼痛的儿童更少(p=.047)。大多数儿童对两种治疗都报告了低操作疼痛(58.3%),尽管至少有一种治疗方法使 41.7%的儿童经历了中高度操作疼痛。

结论

HT 引起的疼痛与 CT 一样多。在这种情况下,有机会更好地管理牙科疼痛。

相似文献

1
Time to complain about pain: Children's self-reported procedural pain in a randomised control trial of Hall and conventional stainless steel crown techniques.抱怨疼痛的时间:一项关于 Hall 技术和传统不锈钢冠技术的随机对照试验中,儿童自我报告的操作疼痛。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jul;33(4):382-393. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13059. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
2
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.
3
Comparison of the treatment outcomes of the conventional stainless steel crown restorations and the hall technique in the treatment of carious primary molars.比较常规不锈钢冠修复和 Hall 技术治疗龋齿性乳磨牙的治疗效果。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Apr;24(4):584-594. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_460_20.
4
Comparison of the Treatment Assessments of the Conventional Stainless-Steel Crown Restorations and the Hall Technique.传统不锈钢冠修复与霍尔技术治疗评估的比较
West Afr J Med. 2020 Jul-Aug;37(3):253-259.
5
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.用于治疗乳牙龋齿的补牙材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub2.
6
Alternative Caries Management Options for Primary Molars: 2.5-Year Outcomes of a Randomised Clinical Trial.乳牙龋病的替代治疗方案:一项随机临床试验的 2.5 年结果。
Caries Res. 2017;51(6):605-614. doi: 10.1159/000477855. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Is the traditional placement of stainless steel crowns in primary teeth more painful than the non-preparation Hall technique?传统方法在乳磨牙上放置不锈钢预成冠是否比不备牙的 Hall 技术更痛?
Evid Based Dent. 2023 Sep;24(3):108-109. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00906-3. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
8
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.乳牙咬合面-邻面龋的非创伤性修复治疗与霍尔技术对比:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Mar 31;17:169. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1270-z.
9
The success of stainless steel crowns placed with the Hall technique: a retrospective study.采用霍尔技术放置不锈钢冠的成功率:一项回顾性研究。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2014 Dec;145(12):1248-53. doi: 10.14219/jada.2014.89.
10
General dental practitioners' views on the use of stainless steel crowns to restore primary molars.普通牙科医生对使用不锈钢冠修复乳磨牙的看法。
Br Dent J. 2005 Oct 8;199(7):453-5; discussion 441. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812746.

引用本文的文献

1
Swedish dentists' use of pharmacological pain management in children: a survey.瑞典牙医对儿童的药物性疼痛管理:一项调查
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1007/s40368-025-01082-x.
2
Do Hall Technique Crowns Affect Intra-arch Dimensions? A Split-mouth Quasi-experimental Non-randomized Feasibility Pilot Study.杜氏技术冠是否会影响牙弓内尺寸?一项半口准实验性非随机可行性初步研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jun;17(6):673-682. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2858.