Trindade Miguel, Teixeira Mafalda, Serôdio João, Favas Catarina, Delgado Alves José
Department of Internal Medicine IV, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
Department of Internal Medicine IV, Systemic Immune-Mediated Diseases Unit (UDIMS), Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 27;15(1):e34259. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34259. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Background Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical condition that bestows substantial morbidity and mortality. Literature is scarce regarding SE in elderly patients, particularly in the context of internal medicine wards. Aim To characterize SE patients admitted to an internal medicine ward, identify potential outcome predictors and differences between young and elderly, as well as convulsive (CSE) and non-convulsive SE (NCSE) patients. Methods We enrolled 135 consecutive patients in an observational, retrospective cohort study. We established elderly patients as more than 64 years old and defined worse prognosis as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS)>4. Results The SE population was 73% elderly, and 75% presented with NCSE, mainly metabolic, idiopathic, or vascular SE. The intra-hospital mortality was 51%, and 62% had an mRS>4 at discharge. NCSE and electroencephalogram (EEG) with paroxysmal activity at discharge were predictive of a worse prognosis. Elderly patients had increased disability at admission, most had NCSE (81%), and the SE etiology differed with more idiopathic and vascular causes. In the elderly, mortality was increased, as was the number of patients with mRS>4 at discharge. NCSE patients had the more neurodegenerative disease (30%) and presented predominantly with vascular and anoxic causes. Morbidity and mortality were also increased in the NCSE group. There was no difference in the antiepileptic drugs used or in the percentage of patients achieving an EEG with no paroxysmal activity between the subpopulations. Conclusion SE in elderly patients should be addressed distinctly. Current approaches based on the strategies used for standard CSE have shown little or no efficacy overall.
背景 癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种具有较高发病率和死亡率的疾病。关于老年患者的SE的文献较少,尤其是在内科病房的背景下。目的 描述入住内科病房的SE患者的特征,确定潜在的预后预测因素以及年轻人和老年人之间、惊厥性癫痫持续状态(CSE)和非惊厥性癫痫持续状态(NCSE)患者之间的差异。方法 我们在一项观察性回顾性队列研究中纳入了135例连续患者。我们将老年患者定义为年龄超过64岁,并将改良Rankin量表(mRS)>4定义为预后较差。结果 SE患者中73%为老年人,75%为NCSE,主要为代谢性、特发性或血管性SE。住院死亡率为51%,出院时62%的患者mRS>4。NCSE和出院时脑电图(EEG)有阵发性活动可预测预后较差。老年患者入院时残疾增加,大多数为NCSE(81%),SE病因不同,特发性和血管性病因更多。在老年人中,死亡率增加,出院时mRS>4的患者数量也增加。NCSE患者患神经退行性疾病的比例更高(30%),主要表现为血管性和缺氧性病因。NCSE组的发病率和死亡率也增加。亚组之间使用的抗癫痫药物或脑电图无阵发性活动的患者百分比没有差异。结论 老年患者的SE应区别对待。目前基于标准CSE策略的方法总体上显示出很少或没有疗效。