Sangaletti Rudy, Zanna Luigi, Akkaya Mustafa, Sandiford Nemandra, Ekhtiari Seper, Gehrke Thorsten, Citak Mustafa
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico - Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O.C Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
Bone Joint J. 2023 Mar 1;105-B(3):294-300. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B3.BJJ-2022-0800.R1.
Despite numerous studies focusing on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. Metachronous PJIs are PJIs that can arise in the same or other artificial joints after a period of time, in patients who have previously had PJI. Between January 2010 and December 2018, 661 patients with multiple joint prostheses in situ were treated for PJI at our institution. Of these, 73 patients (11%) developed a metachronous PJI (periprosthetic infection in patients who have previously had PJI in another joint, after a lag period) after a mean time interval of 49.5 months (SD 30.24; 7 to 82.9). To identify patient-related risk factors for a metachronous PJI, the following parameters were analyzed: sex; age; BMI; and pre-existing comorbidity. Metachronous infections were divided into three groups: Group 1, metachronous infections in ipsilateral joints; Group 2, metachronous infections of the contralateral lower limb; and Group 3, metachronous infections of the lower and upper limb. We identified a total of 73 metachronous PJIs: 32 PJIs in Group 1, 38 in Group 2, and one in Group 3. The rate of metachronous infection was 11% (73 out 661 cases) at a mean of four years following first infection. Diabetes mellitus incidence was found significantly more frequently in the metachronous infection group than in non-metachronous infection group. The rate of infection in Group 1 (21.1%) was significantly higher (p = 0.049) compared to Groups 2 (6.2%) and 3 (3%). The time interval of metachronous infection development was shorter in adjacent joint infections. Concordance between the bacterium of the first PJI and that of the metachronous PJI in Group 1 (21/34) was significantly higher than Group 2 (13/38; p = 0.001). The findings of this study suggest that metachronous PJI occurs in more than one in ten patients with an index PJI. Female patients, diabetic patients, and patients with a polymicrobial index PJI are at significantly higher risk for developing a metachronous PJI. Furthermore, metachronous PJIs are significantly more likely to occur in an adjacent joint (e.g. ipsilateral hip and knee) as opposed to a more remote site (i.e. contralateral or upper vs lower limb). Additionally, adjacent joint PJIs occur significantly earlier and are more likely to be caused by the same bacteria as the index PJI.
尽管有大量研究聚焦于人工关节周围感染(PJI),但关于异时性感染的危险因素和发生时间却没有可靠的数据。异时性PJI是指在先前发生过PJI的患者中,经过一段时间后,在同一个或其他人工关节中出现的PJI。2010年1月至2018年12月期间,我院对661例原位有多关节假体的患者进行了PJI治疗。其中,73例患者(11%)在平均49.5个月(标准差30.24;7至82.9个月)的时间间隔后发生了异时性PJI(先前在另一个关节发生过PJI的患者在一段延迟期后出现的人工关节周围感染)。为了确定异时性PJI的患者相关危险因素,分析了以下参数:性别、年龄、体重指数(BMI)和既往合并症。异时性感染分为三组:第1组,同侧关节的异时性感染;第2组,对侧下肢的异时性感染;第3组,下肢和上肢的异时性感染。我们共确定了73例异时性PJI:第1组32例PJI,第2组38例,第3组1例。首次感染后平均四年时,异时性感染率为11%(661例中的73例)。发现糖尿病在异时性感染组中的发生率明显高于非异时性感染组。与第2组(6.2%)和第3组(3%)相比,第1组的感染率(21.1%)显著更高(p = 0.049)。相邻关节感染时异时性感染发生的时间间隔较短。第1组中首次PJI的细菌与异时性PJI的细菌之间的一致性(21/34)明显高于第2组(13/38;p = 0.001)。本研究结果表明,在有初始PJI的患者中,超过十分之一的患者会发生异时性PJI。女性患者、糖尿病患者以及初始PJI为多种微生物感染的患者发生异时性PJI的风险显著更高。此外,异时性PJI更有可能发生在相邻关节(如同侧髋关节和膝关节),而不是更远处的部位(即对侧或上肢与下肢)。此外,相邻关节的PJI发生时间明显更早,并且更有可能由与初始PJI相同的细菌引起。