Suppr超能文献

糖尿病及其类型与急性心肌梗死患者住院管理和结局的关系。

Association of Diabetes Mellitus and Its Types with In-Hospital Management and Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke on Trent, United Kingdom.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Split, Split, Croatia; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Jul;52:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.02.008. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important risk factor for adverse outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but large-scale studies investigating the differential impact of Type 1 DM (T1DM) and Type 2 DM (T2DM) on AMI outcomes are lacking.

METHODS

All adult discharges for AMI in the National Inpatient Sample (October 2015 to December 2018) were included and stratified into T1DM, T2DM and non-DM (NDM) groups. Outcomes of interests were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), major bleeding and acute ischemic stroke, as well as invasive management. Binomial hierarchical multilevel multivariable logistic regression with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) was used to investigate the association between DM and its subtypes with the AMI outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 2,587,615 patients, there were 29,250 (1.1 %) T1DM and 1,032,925 (39.9 %) T2DM patients. After multivariable adjustment, patients with T1DM had increased odds of MACCE (aOR 1.20, 95 % CI 1.09-1.31), all-cause mortality (aOR 1.20, 95 % CI 1.08-1.33) and major bleeding (aOR 1.28, 95 % CI 1.13-1.44), whilst T2DM patients had increased odds of MACCE (aOR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.01-1.05) and ischemic stroke (aOR 1.09, 95 % CI 1.05-1.13), compared to NDM patients. The adjusted odds of receiving percutaneous coronary intervention were lower in both T1DM and T2DM patients (aOR 0.70, 95 % CI 0.66-0.75 and aOR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.94-0.96, respectively), but T2DM patients showed higher utilization of composite percutaneous and surgical revascularization (aOR 1.03, 95 % CI 1.03-1.04) compared to NDM patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DM patients presenting with AMI have worse in-hospital clinical outcomes compared to NDM patients. There are important DM type-related differences with T1DM patients having overall worse outcomes and receiving less overall revascularization.

摘要

背景

糖尿病(DM)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)后不良结局的重要危险因素,但缺乏大规模研究来调查 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)和 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)对 AMI 结局的差异影响。

方法

纳入了全国住院患者样本(2015 年 10 月至 2018 年 12 月)中所有 AMI 的成年出院患者,并分为 T1DM、T2DM 和非糖尿病(NDM)组。研究的主要转归包括全因死亡率、主要心血管和脑血管不良事件(MACCE)、大出血和急性缺血性卒中和有创治疗。采用二项式分层多级多变量逻辑回归分析,使用调整后的优势比(aOR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI),以评估 DM 及其亚型与 AMI 结局之间的关系。

结果

在 2587615 例患者中,有 29250 例(1.1%)T1DM 和 1032925 例(39.9%)T2DM 患者。经过多变量调整后,T1DM 患者发生 MACCE(aOR 1.20,95%CI 1.09-1.31)、全因死亡率(aOR 1.20,95%CI 1.08-1.33)和大出血(aOR 1.28,95%CI 1.13-1.44)的风险增加,而 T2DM 患者发生 MACCE(aOR 1.03,95%CI 1.01-1.05)和缺血性卒中等(aOR 1.09,95%CI 1.05-1.13)的风险增加,与 NDM 患者相比。与 NDM 患者相比,T1DM 和 T2DM 患者接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的调整后的几率均降低(aOR 0.70,95%CI 0.66-0.75 和 aOR 0.95,95%CI 0.94-0.96),但 T2DM 患者复合经皮和手术血运重建的利用率更高(aOR 1.03,95%CI 1.03-1.04)。

结论

与 NDM 患者相比,患有 AMI 的 DM 患者的住院临床结局更差。存在重要的 DM 类型相关差异,T1DM 患者总体预后更差,总体血运重建治疗更少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验