Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, 4th floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
Trials. 2023 Feb 28;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07159-6.
Informed consent is considered a fundamental requirement for participation in trials, yet obtaining consent is challenging in a number of populations and settings. This may be due to participants having communication or other disabilities, their capacity to consent fluctuates or they lack capacity, or in emergency situations where their medical condition or the urgent nature of the treatment precludes seeking consent from either the participant or a representative. These challenges, and the subsequent complexity of designing and conducting trials where alternative consent pathways are required, contribute to these populations being underserved in research. Recognising and addressing these challenges is essential to support trials involving these populations and ensure that they have an equitable opportunity to participate in, and benefit from, research. Given the complex nature of these challenges, which are encountered by both adults and children, a cross-disciplinary approach is required.
A UK-wide collaboration, a sub-group of the Trial Conduct Working Group in the MRC-NIHR Trial Methodology Research Partnership, was formed to collectively address these challenges. Members are drawn from disciplines including bioethics, qualitative research, trials methodology, healthcare professions, and social sciences. This commentary draws on our collective expertise to identify key populations where particular methodological and ethical challenges around consent are encountered, articulate the specific issues arising in each population, summarise ongoing and completed research, and identify targets for future research. Key populations include people with communication or other disabilities, people whose capacity to consent fluctuates, adults who lack the capacity to consent, and adults and children in emergency and urgent care settings. Work is ongoing by the sub-group to create a database of resources, to update NIHR guidance, and to develop proposals to address identified research gaps.
Collaboration across disciplines, sectors, organisations, and countries is essential if the ethical and methodological challenges surrounding trials involving complex and alternate consent pathways are to be addressed. Explicating these challenges, sharing resources, and identifying gaps for future research is an essential first step. We hope that doing so will serve as a call to action for others seeking ways to address the current consent-based exclusion of underserved populations from trials.
知情同意被认为是参与试验的基本要求,但在许多人群和环境中,获得同意具有挑战性。这可能是由于参与者存在沟通或其他残疾、他们的同意能力波动或缺乏能力,或者在紧急情况下,他们的医疗状况或紧急治疗排除了向参与者或代表寻求同意。这些挑战,以及随后需要替代同意途径的试验设计和实施的复杂性,导致这些人群在研究中得不到充分服务。认识和应对这些挑战对于支持涉及这些人群的试验以及确保他们有平等的机会参与并从研究中受益至关重要。鉴于这些挑战的复杂性,这些挑战既存在于成年人中,也存在于儿童中,因此需要采取跨学科的方法。
英国范围内的合作,即 MRC-NIHR 试验方法学研究伙伴关系试验实施工作组的一个分组,成立的目的是共同应对这些挑战。成员来自包括生物伦理学、定性研究、试验方法学、医疗保健专业和社会科学在内的学科。本评论意见借鉴了我们的集体专业知识,确定了在同意方面遇到特殊方法学和伦理挑战的关键人群,阐明了每个人群中出现的具体问题,总结了正在进行和已完成的研究,并确定了未来研究的目标。关键人群包括存在沟通或其他残疾的人、同意能力波动的人、缺乏同意能力的成年人以及紧急和紧急护理环境中的成年人和儿童。分组正在努力创建资源数据库,更新 NIHR 指南,并制定解决已确定研究空白的提案。
如果要解决涉及复杂和替代同意途径的试验所涉及的伦理和方法学挑战,跨学科、跨部门、跨组织和跨国界的合作至关重要。阐明这些挑战、共享资源并确定未来研究的空白是必不可少的第一步。我们希望这样做将成为呼吁其他人寻求解决目前因同意而将服务不足的人群排除在试验之外的方法。