Nelson G L
University of Southern Mississippi, Department of Polymer Science, Hattiesburg 39406-0076.
Toxicology. 1987 Dec 1;47(1-2):181-99. doi: 10.1016/0300-483x(87)90167-3.
Fire creates a complex toxic environment involving flame, heat, oxygen depletion, smoke, and toxic gases. The nature of that environment is dependent upon not only the materials present but on the fire event, that is, the fire scenario. Materials have different toxic gas profiles under different conditions; therefore, toxic fire gas generation is not intrinsic to any one material. Large fires in buildings constitute a severe toxic threat regardless of the materials being burned. In the past, building codes in the United States included the phrase, "no more toxic than wood," in reference to fire gases from building materials. Such phrases have recently been deleted, because of the lack of either an accepted definition or test methodology to assess toxicity. While several states have attempted regulatory activity, the most recent approach (taken by the state of New York) has been the establishment of a data bank on toxic potency of building and furnishing materials. The utility of such a data bank without available hazard analysis methodology is open to discussion, since toxic potency data are not directly applicable to toxic hazard assessment. A number of small-scale animal exposure tests have been developed to assess the potency of the toxic combustion products from combustible materials. Criticism of these tests relates to the relevance of the combustion module (a smoke generation apparatus) and the appropriateness of the animal model, particularly for irritant gases. Recent data from more than 2000 fire fatality cases and carbon monoxide exposure cases are discussed in this paper to help put small-scale laboratory test results into perspective. Toxicity is only one of the several fire properties related to materials. All fire parameters are interrelated, that is, they are not independent variables. Thus, predicting the toxicity of burning materials is a problem without a comprehensive solution. Measures have been taken, however, to reduce the number of fires and to reduce fire severity.
火灾会产生一个复杂的有毒环境,其中涉及火焰、热量、氧气消耗、烟雾和有毒气体。该环境的性质不仅取决于存在的材料,还取决于火灾事件,即火灾场景。材料在不同条件下会有不同的有毒气体特征;因此,有毒火灾气体的产生并非任何一种材料所固有。建筑物中的大型火灾构成了严重的有毒威胁,无论燃烧的是什么材料。过去,美国的建筑规范中提到建筑材料产生的火灾气体时包含“毒性不超过木材”这样的表述。由于缺乏公认的定义或评估毒性的测试方法,此类表述最近已被删除。虽然有几个州尝试进行监管活动,但最近的做法(纽约州采取的)是建立一个关于建筑和装修材料毒性强度的数据库。在没有可用的危害分析方法的情况下,这样一个数据库的实用性值得探讨,因为毒性强度数据不能直接应用于有毒危害评估。已经开发了一些小规模动物暴露试验来评估可燃材料燃烧产生的有毒产物的强度。对这些试验的批评涉及燃烧模块(一种烟雾产生装置)的相关性以及动物模型的适用性,特别是对于刺激性气体。本文讨论了来自2000多起火灾死亡案例和一氧化碳暴露案例的最新数据,以帮助正确看待小规模实验室测试结果。毒性只是与材料相关的几种火灾特性之一。所有火灾参数都是相互关联的,也就是说,它们不是独立变量。因此,预测燃烧材料的毒性是一个没有全面解决方案的问题。然而已经采取了措施来减少火灾数量并降低火灾严重程度。