Department of Public Policy and Public Affairs, John McCormack Graduate School of Policy and Global Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Lee); and The Center for Global Health and Health Policy, Global Health and Education Projects, Inc, Riverdale, Maryland (Dr Singh).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(4):E147-E156. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001722. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
Research has shown a dramatic increase in telehealth utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic and marked socioeconomic disparities in telehealth utilization. However, previous studies have shown discrepant findings on the association between the state's telehealth payment parity laws and telehealth utilization, and dearth of differential impact studies by subgroups.
Using a nationally representative Household Pulse Survey from April 2021 to August 2022 and the logistic regression modeling, we estimated the impact of parity payment laws on overall, video, and phone telehealth utilization and related disparities by race and ethncity during the pandemic.
We found that adults in parity states had 23% higher odds of telehealth utilization (odds ratio [OR] = 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.33) and 124% higher odds of video telehealth utilization (OR = 2.24; 95% CI, 1.95-2.57) than their counterparts in nonparity states. In parity states, non-Hispanic White adults had 24% higher odds of telehealth utilization (OR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.35) and non-Hispanic Black adults had 31% higher odds of telehealth utilization (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.65), compared with those in nonparity states. For Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asians, and non-Hispanic other races, there was not a statistically significant effect of parity act on overall telehealth utilization.
Given inequalities in telehealth utilization, increased state policy efforts are needed to reduce access disparities during the ongoing pandemic and beyond.
研究表明,在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程医疗的使用急剧增加,并且远程医疗的使用存在显著的社会经济差异。然而,之前的研究表明,州级远程医疗支付均等化法律与远程医疗使用之间的关联存在不一致的发现,并且缺乏按亚组划分的差异影响研究。
我们使用了一项全国代表性的家庭脉搏调查,该调查于 2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 8 月进行,并使用逻辑回归模型,估计了均等化支付法律对大流行期间整体、视频和电话远程医疗使用以及与种族和民族相关的差异的影响。
我们发现,在均等化州,远程医疗使用率高出 23%(优势比 [OR] = 1.23;95%置信区间 [CI],1.14-1.33),视频远程医疗使用率高出 124%(OR = 2.24;95% CI,1.95-2.57),而非均等化州的对应者。在均等化州,非西班牙裔白种成年人远程医疗使用率高出 24%(OR = 1.24;95% CI:1.14,1.35),而非西班牙裔黑种成年人远程医疗使用率高出 31%(OR = 1.31;95% CI:1.03,1.65),而非均等化州的对应者。对于西班牙裔、非西班牙裔亚裔和非西班牙裔其他种族,均等化法案对整体远程医疗使用率没有统计学上的显著影响。
鉴于远程医疗使用的不平等,需要增加州级政策努力,以减少大流行期间及以后的获取差距。