• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间 LGBTQ+心理健康服务培训计划的实施情况,以确定其可行性和可接受性。

Assessing the Implementation of an LGBTQ+ Mental Health Services Training Program to Determine Feasibility and Acceptability During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

机构信息

Department of Family Science, University of Maryland, College Park, 1142 Valley Drive, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.

University of Maryland Prevention Research Center, College Park, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):109-123. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01505-5. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11121-023-01505-5
PMID:36897487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9999060/
Abstract

Despite significant social and legal progress, LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other sexual and gender minority) populations continue to experience higher rates of mental health and substance use disorders than their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. Effective LGBTQ+ affirmative mental health care is essential for addressing these disparities but is often limited and difficult to access. The shortage of LGBTQ+ affirmative mental health care providers results from the absence of required and accessible LGBTQ+-focused training and technical assistance opportunities for mental health care professionals. This study evaluates the implementation of our COVID-19 adapted, completely virtual, organization- and therapist-focused training program to improve the mental health workforce's cultural competence in working with the LGBTQ+ community: the Sexual and Gender Diversity Learning Community (SGDLC). Guided by an expanded RE-AIM model, we used administrator and therapist feedback to assess SGDLC implementation factors to understand how it may be best translated for scaled-up promotion and widespread adoption. Assessment of the initial reach, adoption, and implementation of the SGDLC indicated that it had strong feasibility; reports on satisfaction and relevance support the SGDLC's acceptability. Maintenance could not be fully assessed from the short study follow-up period. Still, administrators and therapists expressed an intent to continue their newfound practices, a desire for continued training and technical assistance in this area, but also concerns about finding additional opportunities for this education.

摘要

尽管在社会和法律方面取得了重大进展,但 LGBTQ+(女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和其他性少数群体)人群仍然比异性恋和顺性别者经历更高的心理健康和物质使用障碍率。有效的 LGBTQ+ 肯定性心理健康护理对于解决这些差异至关重要,但往往受到限制且难以获得。缺乏 LGBTQ+ 肯定性心理健康护理提供者是因为缺乏针对心理健康护理专业人员的必要和可获得的 LGBTQ+ 重点培训和技术援助机会。本研究评估了我们 COVID-19 适应的、完全虚拟的、以组织和治疗师为重点的培训计划的实施情况,以提高心理健康工作者在与 LGBTQ+ 社区合作方面的文化能力:性和性别多样性学习社区 (SGDLC)。本研究以扩展的 RE-AIM 模型为指导,利用管理员和治疗师的反馈来评估 SGDLC 的实施因素,以了解如何最好地将其推广和广泛采用。对 SGDLC 的初始覆盖范围、采用和实施的评估表明,它具有很强的可行性;对满意度和相关性的报告支持 SGDLC 的可接受性。由于短期研究随访期,无法对维持情况进行全面评估。尽管如此,管理员和治疗师表示有意继续他们新发现的实践,希望在该领域继续接受培训和技术援助,但也对寻找更多此类教育机会表示担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f963/11133016/ba0a0c366efd/11121_2023_1505_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f963/11133016/b7ecc51508b9/11121_2023_1505_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f963/11133016/ba0a0c366efd/11121_2023_1505_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f963/11133016/b7ecc51508b9/11121_2023_1505_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f963/11133016/ba0a0c366efd/11121_2023_1505_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the Implementation of an LGBTQ+ Mental Health Services Training Program to Determine Feasibility and Acceptability During the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估在 COVID-19 大流行期间 LGBTQ+心理健康服务培训计划的实施情况,以确定其可行性和可接受性。
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):109-123. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01505-5. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
2
What motivates community mental and behavioral health organizations to participate in LGBTQ+ cultural competency trainings?是什么促使社区精神和行为健康组织参与 LGBTQ+文化能力培训?
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2022;92(6):647-656. doi: 10.1037/ort0000641. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
3
LGBTQ+ cultural-competence training effectiveness: Mental health organization and therapist survey outcome results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.LGBTQ+文化能力培训效果:一项试点随机对照试验的心理健康组织及治疗师调查结果
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Aug 25. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2893.
4
The impact of COVID-19 on the LGBTQ+ community: Comparisons between cisgender, heterosexual people, cisgender sexual minority people, and gender minority people.COVID-19 对 LGBTQ+ 群体的影响:跨性别、异性恋者、顺性别性少数群体和性别少数群体之间的比较。
Psychiatry Res. 2022 Mar;309:114391. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114391. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
5
"Being Queer, It Was Really Isolating": Stigma and Mental Health Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) Young People During COVID-19.“身为酷儿,真的很孤立”:新冠肺炎疫情期间,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ+)青年的污名与心理健康。
Health Educ Behav. 2024 Aug;51(4):521-532. doi: 10.1177/10901981241249973. Epub 2024 May 17.
6
Training in LGBTQ-affirmative cognitive behavioral therapy: A randomized controlled trial across LGBTQ community centers.在 LGBTQ 社区中心进行 LGBTQ 肯定认知行为疗法培训:一项随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2022 Jul;90(7):582-599. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000745.
7
Current Capacity and Future Implementation of Mental Health Services in U.S. LGBTQ Community Centers.美国 LGBTQ 社区中心心理健康服务的现有能力和未来实施情况。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Jun;72(6):669-676. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000575. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Integrating lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) competency into the dental school curriculum.将女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿(LGBTQ)能力融入牙科学院课程。
J Dent Educ. 2024 Jun;88(6):823-831. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13476. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Effectiveness of an eHealth intervention for reducing psychological distress and increasing COVID-19 knowledge and protective behaviors among racialized sexual and gender minority adults: A quasi-experimental study (#SafeHandsSafeHearts).一项电子健康干预措施在减少种族化性少数和性别少数成年人的心理困扰、增加新冠病毒知识及防护行为方面的效果:一项准实验研究(#安全之手安全之心)
PLoS One. 2024 May 3;19(5):e0280710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280710. eCollection 2024.
10
How Much Bullying and Discrimination Are Reported by Sexual and Gender Minorities in Orthopaedics?性少数群体和跨性别者在骨科报告的欺凌和歧视有多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1282-1292. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003009. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Systems Thinking, Causal Loop Diagram, and Systems Dynamic in Public Health Challenges: Navigating Long COVID Syndrome and Sense of Smell in LGBTQIA+ Communities.系统思维、因果循环图和系统动力学在公共卫生挑战中的应用:应对LGBTQIA+群体中的长期新冠综合征和嗅觉问题
Public Health Chall. 2024 Sep 3;3(3):e70004. doi: 10.1002/puh2.70004. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Preventing and Managing Chronic Disease Through Implementation Science: Editor's Introduction to the Supplemental Issue.通过实施科学预防和管理慢性病:特刊编辑引言
Prev Sci. 2024 Apr;25(Suppl 1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01617-y. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
3
LGBTQ+ cultural-competence training effectiveness: Mental health organization and therapist survey outcome results from a pilot randomized controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Mediators of the Disparities in Depression Between Sexual Minority and Heterosexual Individuals: A Systematic Review.性少数群体与异性恋个体抑郁差异的中介因素:系统评价。
Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):925-959. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01862-0. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
The availability of LGBT-specific mental health and substance abuse treatment in the United States.美国提供的针对 LGBT 群体的心理健康和物质滥用治疗。
Health Serv Res. 2020 Dec;55(6):932-943. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13559. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Transgender and non-conforming persons' mental healthcare experiences: An integrative review.
LGBTQ+文化能力培训效果:一项试点随机对照试验的心理健康组织及治疗师调查结果
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Aug 25. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2893.
跨性别和不符合传统性别规范者的心理健康保健体验:综合述评。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2019 Apr;33(2):203-210. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
4
Sexual orientation differences in functional limitations, disability, and mental health services use: Results from the 2013-2014 National Health Interview Survey.性取向在功能限制、残疾和精神卫生服务使用方面的差异:来自 2013-2014 年全国健康访谈调查的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Dec;85(12):1111-1121. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000243. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
5
Patterns of Mental Health Care Utilization Among Sexual Orientation Minority Groups.性取向少数群体的心理健康护理利用模式。
J Homosex. 2018;65(2):135-153. doi: 10.1080/00918369.2017.1311552. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
6
Does affirmative training matter? Assessing CFT students' beliefs about sexual orientation and their level of affirmative training.肯定性训练是否重要?评估 CFT 学生对性取向的信念及其肯定性训练水平。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2010 Apr;36(2):171-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00172.x.
7
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
8
Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence.女同性恋、男同性恋和双性恋群体中的偏见、社会压力与心理健康:概念问题与研究证据
Psychol Bull. 2003 Sep;129(5):674-697. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
9
Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.评估健康促进干预措施对公众健康的影响:RE-AIM框架。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.