CNRS, UMR EcoFoG (Agroparistech, Cirad, INRAE, Université des Antilles, Université de la Guyane), Campus Agronomique, 97310 Kourou, French Guiana.
Université de la Guyane, UMR EcoFoG (Agroparistech, Cirad, CNRS, INRAE, Université des Antilles), Campus Agronomique, 97310 Kourou, French Guiana.
Ann Bot. 2023 May 15;131(5):801-811. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad042.
Intraspecific variability in leaf water-related traits remains little explored despite its potential importance in the context of increasing drought frequency and severity. Studies comparing intra- and interspecific variability of leaf traits often rely on inappropriate sampling designs that result in non-robust estimates, mainly owing to an excess of the species/individual ratio in community ecology or, on the contrary, to an excess of the individual/species ratio in population ecology.
We carried out virtual testing of three strategies to compare intra- and interspecific trait variability. Guided by the results of our simulations, we carried out field sampling. We measured nine traits related to leaf water and carbon acquisition in 100 individuals from ten Neotropical tree species. We also assessed trait variation among leaves within individuals and among measurements within leaves to control for sources of intraspecific trait variability.
The most robust sampling, based on the same number of species and individuals per species, revealed higher intraspecific variability than previously recognized, higher for carbon-related traits (47-92 and 4-33 % of relative and absolute variation, respectively) than for water-related traits (47-60 and 14-44 % of relative and absolute variation, respectively), which remained non-negligible. Nevertheless, part of the intraspecific trait variability was explained by variation of leaves within individuals (12-100 % of relative variation) or measurement variations within leaf (0-19 % of relative variation) and not only by individual ontogenetic stages and environmental conditions.
We conclude that robust sampling, based on the same number of species and individuals per species, is needed to explore global or local variation in leaf water- and carbon-related traits within and among tree species, because our study revealed higher intraspecific variation than previously recognized.
尽管种内叶片水分相关特征的变异性在日益频繁和严重的干旱背景下具有潜在的重要性,但人们对其了解甚少。比较叶片特征的种内和种间变异性的研究通常依赖于不适当的采样设计,这些设计导致结果不可靠,主要是由于群落生态学中物种/个体比过多,或者种群生态学中个体/物种比过多。
我们进行了三种比较种内和种间特征变异性策略的虚拟测试。根据模拟结果,我们进行了实地采样。我们测量了来自 10 种新热带树种的 100 个个体的 9 个与叶片水分和碳获取相关的特征。我们还评估了个体内叶片间和叶片内测量间的特征变化,以控制种内特征变异性的来源。
基于每个物种相同数量的物种和个体的最稳健采样,揭示了比以前认识到的更高的种内变异性,与水分相关的特征(相对和绝对变异的 47-92%和 4-33%)比碳相关的特征(相对和绝对变异的 47-60%和 14-44%)更高,这仍然不可忽视。然而,部分种内特征变异性是由个体内叶片的变异(相对变异的 12-100%)或叶片内测量的变异(相对变异的 0-19%)解释的,而不仅仅是个体的发育阶段和环境条件。
我们的结论是,需要基于每个物种相同数量的物种和个体进行稳健的采样,以探索树种内和树种间叶片水分和碳相关特征的全球或局部变化,因为我们的研究揭示了比以前认识到的更高的种内变异性。