Suppr超能文献

细胞减灭术和腹腔热灌注化疗期间术中液体管理策略对术后结局的影响。

The impact on postoperative outcomes of intraoperative fluid management strategies during cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Science, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Colorectal Surgery, Uppsala University, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Surgical Sciences, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Uppsala University Hospital, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;49(8):1474-1480. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of intraoperative fluid management during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on postoperative outcomes has been poorly investigated. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of intraoperative fluid management strategy on postoperative outcomes and survival.

METHODS

509 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at Uppsala University Hospital/Sweden 2004-2017 were categorized into two groups according to the intraoperative fluid management strategy: pre-goal directed therapy (pre-GDT) and goal directed therapy (GDT), where a hemodynamic monitor (CardioQ or FloTrac/Vigileo) was used to optimize fluid management. Impact on morbidity, postoperative hemorrhage, length-of-stay and survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

The pre-GDT group received higher fluid volume compared to the GDT group (mean 19.9 vs. 16.2 ml/kg/h, p < 0.001). Overall postoperative morbidity Grade III-V was higher in the GDT group (30% vs. 22%, p = 0.03). Multivariable adjusted odds ratio (OR) for Grade III-V morbidity was 1.80 (95%CI 1.10-3.10, p = 0.02) in the GDT group. Numerically, more cases of postoperative hemorrhage were found in the GDT group (9% vs. 5%, p = 0.09), but no correlation was observed in the multivariable analysis 1.37 (95%CI 0.64-2.95, p = 0.40). An oxaliplatin regimen was a significant risk factor for postoperative hemorrhage (p = 0.03). Mean length of stay was shorter in the GDT group (17 vs. 26 days, p < 0.0001). Survival did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSION

While GDT increased the risk for postoperative morbidity, it was associated with shortened hospital stay. Intraoperative fluid management during CRS and HIPEC did not affect the postoperative risk for hemorrhage, while the use of an oxaliplatin regimen did.

摘要

背景

细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热灌注化疗(HIPEC)期间术中液体管理对术后结果的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在回顾性评估术中液体管理策略对术后结果和生存的影响。

方法

2004 年至 2017 年,在乌普萨拉大学医院/瑞典接受 CRS 和 HIPEC 的 509 名患者根据术中液体管理策略分为两组:预目标导向治疗(pre-GDT)和目标导向治疗(GDT),其中使用血流动力学监测仪(CardioQ 或 FloTrac/Vigileo)来优化液体管理。分析发病率、术后出血、住院时间和生存的影响。

结果

与 GDT 组相比,pre-GDT 组接受的液体量更高(平均 19.9 与 16.2 ml/kg/h,p<0.001)。GDT 组术后 III-V 级发病率更高(30%比 22%,p=0.03)。多变量调整后,GDT 组 III-V 级发病率的优势比(OR)为 1.80(95%CI 1.10-3.10,p=0.02)。GDT 组术后出血病例数较多(9%比 5%,p=0.09),但多变量分析中无相关性 1.37(95%CI 0.64-2.95,p=0.40)。奥沙利铂方案是术后出血的显著危险因素(p=0.03)。GDT 组的平均住院时间较短(17 与 26 天,p<0.0001)。两组之间的生存率无差异。

结论

虽然 GDT 增加了术后发病率的风险,但与住院时间缩短相关。CRS 和 HIPEC 期间的术中液体管理并未影响术后出血风险,而奥沙利铂方案的使用则会影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验