School of Civil Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, People's Republic of China.
Anhui Provincial Engineering Laboratory for Rural Water Environment and Resources, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, People's Republic of China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(19):56330-56342. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26226-8. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
Microplastics are an emerging pollutant of global concern, and fluorescence staining as an efficient method for small-sized microplastic qualification often undergoes the serious interference from external environments. The key steps affecting the accuracy of fluorescent staining and the corresponding quality assurance measures were rarely known. Therefore, this study took the Nile Red/DAPI co-staining method as an example to explore the key factors affecting its accuracy and effective measures to avoid interference. High background microplastic contamination in typical lab waters (up to 1115 MP/L), glass fiber filter membrane and glassware were identified as dominant factors affecting microplastic quantification. The background microplastics in lab waters mainly originated from the process of water production and storage. A simple filtration process removed 99% of the background microplastic in the lab waters. After burning at 500 °C for 1 h, the microplastic contamination in the filter membrane and glassware was completely eliminated. HO pretreatment and exposure time caused erroneous microplastic size assessment, and were suggested to be set at 48 h and 10 ms, respectively. During the extraction process, the residue in beakers reached ~ 20% and > 50% for 5 μm and 20 μm sized microplastics, respectively, greatly contributing to the microplastic loss. The comprehensive modified measures caused microplastic concentrations in the three typical samples detected by Nile Red/DAPI co-staining method to decrease by 65.7 - 92.2% and to approach the micro-Raman results. This study clarified the reasons for interfering with quantitative microplastics by fluorescent staining and the effective measures to avoid interference, which were conducive to improving the accuracy of quantitative methods of microplastics.
微塑料是一种新兴的全球性污染物,荧光染色作为一种鉴定小尺寸微塑料的有效方法,经常受到外部环境的严重干扰。影响荧光染色准确性的关键步骤及其相应的质量保证措施鲜为人知。因此,本研究以尼罗红/DAPI 共染色法为例,探讨了影响其准确性的关键因素和避免干扰的有效措施。典型实验室水中(高达 1115 MP/L)、玻璃纤维滤膜和玻璃器皿中的高背景微塑料污染被确定为影响微塑料定量的主要因素。实验室水中的背景微塑料主要来源于水的生产和储存过程。简单的过滤过程可去除实验室水中 99%的背景微塑料。在 500°C 下燃烧 1 小时后,滤膜和玻璃器皿中的微塑料污染完全消除。HO 预处理和曝光时间会导致错误的微塑料尺寸评估,建议分别设置为 48 小时和 10 毫秒。在提取过程中,烧杯中的残留物分别达到 5μm 和 20μm 大小微塑料的 20%和>50%,这极大地导致了微塑料的损失。综合改良措施使尼罗红/DAPI 共染色法检测的三种典型样品中的微塑料浓度分别降低了 65.7%−92.2%,接近微拉曼结果。本研究阐明了荧光染色定量微塑料时干扰的原因和避免干扰的有效措施,有利于提高微塑料定量方法的准确性。