Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;169(3):615-621. doi: 10.1002/ohn.269. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
Recently, the Bonebridge 602 implant was introduced. Its smaller dimensions facilitate implantation even in surgically demanding cases. However, in extreme anatomical conditions, implant lifts are still required. We intended to report on the medical and audiological outcomes of all patients implanted with the implant with a secondary focus on the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the use of 1-mm lifts.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary academic center.
We retrospectively analyzed all patients implanted with the Bonebridge 602. Patient demographics and surgically-specific data were collected from the medical charts. Furthermore, audiological results were assessed. Outcomes were compared between implantations with versus without lifts.
Twenty-one devices were implanted during the study period. Satisfactory audiological results were observed, while no intra- or postoperative adverse events occurred. The majority of patients were daily users at the end of the observation period (n = 20/21, 95.2%), and one patient (n = 1/21, 4.8%) was a nonuser after 6 months of use because of subjective dissatisfaction. Due to anatomical considerations, 1-mm lifts were used in 4 implantations (19.0%). The application of lifts did not result in prolonged surgical times, complications, or shorter time of use, nor did it negatively affect audiometric results.
Implantations with the new and smaller Bonebridge were associated with gratifying medical and audiological outcomes. Still, in extreme anatomical conditions, 1-mm lifts are necessary. Nonetheless, surgical placement with the help of lifts seems safe, effective, and feasible, and is a viable option in cases with challenging anatomies due to previous surgeries or anomalies.
最近引入了 Bonebridge 602 植入物。其较小的尺寸即使在手术要求较高的情况下也便于植入。然而,在极端解剖条件下,仍需要植入物提升。我们旨在报告所有植入该植入物的患者的医学和听力结果,并重点关注 1 毫米提升的安全性、有效性和可行性。
回顾性队列研究。
三级学术中心。
我们回顾性分析了所有植入 Bonebridge 602 的患者。从病历中收集患者的人口统计学和手术特定数据。此外,还评估了听力结果。将有无提升的植入物的结果进行了比较。
研究期间共植入了 21 个设备。观察到令人满意的听力结果,且无术中或术后不良事件发生。在观察期末,大多数患者(n=20/21,95.2%)为日常使用者,一名患者(n=1/21,4.8%)因主观不满在使用 6 个月后成为非使用者。由于解剖学考虑,在 4 例植入物中使用了 1 毫米提升(19.0%)。提升的应用并未导致手术时间延长、并发症或使用时间缩短,也未对听力结果产生负面影响。
新型较小的 Bonebridge 植入物与令人满意的医学和听力结果相关。尽管如此,在极端解剖条件下,仍需要 1 毫米提升。然而,在由于先前手术或异常导致解剖结构具有挑战性的情况下,借助提升进行手术放置似乎是安全、有效和可行的,并且是一种可行的选择。