Suppr超能文献

翻修内镜后肋软骨移植术:是否可行?

Revision Endoscopic Posterior Costal Cartilage Grafting: Is It Feasible?

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Children's Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug;169(2):432-434. doi: 10.1002/ohn.275. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

The objective of this work is to examine the feasibility of revision endoscopic posterior costal cartilage graft (EPCCG) placement for posterior glottic stenosis (PGS) and bilateral vocal fold immobility (BVFI). Revision and primary cases were compared with respect to decannulation rates, and it was hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes. Twenty-one patients met inclusion criteria (14 primary, 7 revision). Thirteen (62%) had a primary indication of PGS, and 8 (42%) were for BVFI. There were no differences between revision and primary groups with respect to age, gender, or comorbidities (p > .05). There was no difference between groups with respect to decannulation rate (85% primary vs 100% revision, p = .32). Thus, revision EPCCG appears to have comparable results to primary EPCCG with respect to decannulation rate and time to decannulation. EPCCG may be a feasible alternative to open airway reconstruction for PGS and BVFI in selected patients.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨内镜下后肋软骨瓣修复术(EPCCG)治疗后声门后狭窄(PGS)和双侧声带固定(BVFI)的可行性。比较了翻修组和初治组的拔管率,并假设两组的治疗效果没有差异。21 名患者符合纳入标准(14 例初治,7 例翻修)。13 例(62%)的原发疾病为 PGS,8 例(42%)为 BVFI。翻修组和初治组在年龄、性别和合并症方面无差异(p>.05)。两组的拔管率也无差异(初治组为 85%,翻修组为 100%,p=.32)。因此,就拔管率和拔管时间而言,EPCCG 翻修与 EPCCG 初治的效果相当。对于特定患者,EPCCG 可能是一种替代开放式气道重建术治疗 PGS 和 BVFI 的可行方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验