Muftah Mayssan, Barshop Kenneth, Redd Walker D, Goldin Alison H, Lo Wai-Kit, Chan Walter W
Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Harvard Medical School.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;58(3):242-246. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001845.
To assess the predictive value of baseline peripheral absolute eosinophil counts (AECs) for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) response in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE).
PPI leads to histologic remission in ~50% of EoE patients, although there are few distinguishing clinical features between PPI-responsive (PPI-r-EoE) and nonresponsive (PPI-nr-EoE) diseases. Peripheral eosinophilia is present in ~50% of EoE cases and is associated with eosinophil density on esophageal biopsy and worse clinical outcomes. The association between peripheral eosinophilia and PPI-responsiveness in EoE remains unclear.
This is a retrospective cohort study of adult EoE patients at a tertiary center between 2012 and 2016. All patients underwent twice daily PPI trials for ≥8 weeks followed by repeat esophageal biopsies and were classified as PPI-r-EoE or PPI-nr-EoE based on histologic response (<15 eosinophils/high power field). Baseline peripheral AEC was obtained within 1 month before index endoscopy. Analyses were performed using Fisher exact/Student t test (univariate) and logistic regression (multivariable).
One hundred eighty-three patients (91 PPI-nr-EoE and 92 PPI-r-EoE) were included. Mean peripheral AEC was higher among PPI-nr-EoE patients (0.41 vs 0.24 K/µL, P = 0.013). Baseline peripheral eosinophilia (>0.5 K/µL) was more prevalent among patients with PPI-nr-EoE (70.4% vs 45.5%, P = 0.023) and a history of food impaction (51.9% vs 23.7%, P = 0.0082). On multivariable analyses, peripheral eosinophilia remained an independent predictor for PPI response (adjacent odds ratio = 2.86, CI: 1.07-7.62, P = 0.036) and food impaction (adjacent odds ratio = 2.80, CI: 1.07-7.35, P = 0.037).
Baseline peripheral eosinophilia independently predicts PPI nonresponse and food impaction in EoE patients. Peripheral AEC may help therapy selection in EoE and prevent delays in achieving histologic remission.
评估基线外周血绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数(AEC)对嗜酸性粒细胞性食管炎(EoE)患者质子泵抑制剂(PPI)反应的预测价值。
PPI可使约50%的EoE患者实现组织学缓解,尽管PPI反应性(PPI-r-EoE)和无反应性(PPI-nr-EoE)疾病之间几乎没有明显的临床特征差异。约50%的EoE病例存在外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多,且与食管活检时的嗜酸性粒细胞密度及更差的临床结局相关。EoE中外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多与PPI反应性之间的关联仍不明确。
这是一项对2012年至2016年期间某三级中心成年EoE患者的回顾性队列研究。所有患者每日接受两次PPI试验,持续≥8周,随后重复进行食管活检,并根据组织学反应(<15个嗜酸性粒细胞/高倍视野)分为PPI-r-EoE或PPI-nr-EoE。在首次内镜检查前1个月内获取基线外周血AEC。采用Fisher精确检验/Student t检验(单变量)和逻辑回归(多变量)进行分析。
纳入183例患者(91例PPI-nr-EoE和92例PPI-r-EoE)。PPI-nr-EoE患者的平均外周血AEC更高(0.41对0.24 K/µL,P = 0.013)。基线外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多(>0.5 K/µL)在PPI-nr-EoE患者中更常见(70.4%对45.5%,P = 0.023),且在有食物嵌塞史的患者中更常见(51.9%对23.7%,P = 0.0082)。在多变量分析中,外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多仍然是PPI反应的独立预测因素(调整优势比 = 2.86,CI:1.07 - 7.62,P = 0.036)和食物嵌塞的独立预测因素(调整优势比 = 2.80,CI:1.07 - 7.35,P = 0.037)。
基线外周血嗜酸性粒细胞增多可独立预测EoE患者对PPI无反应及食物嵌塞。外周血AEC可能有助于EoE的治疗选择,并防止组织学缓解延迟。