Suppr超能文献

糖尿病管理中的安全消息传递:内容分析

Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis.

作者信息

Robinson Stephanie A, Zocchi Mark, Purington Carolyn, Am Linda, DeLaughter Kathryn, Vimalananda Varsha G, Netherton Dane, Ash Arlene S, Hogan Timothy P, Shimada Stephanie L

机构信息

Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Veterans Affairs Bedford Healthcare System, Bedford, MA, United States.

The Pulmonary Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Mar 23;8:e40272. doi: 10.2196/40272.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Secure messaging use is associated with improved diabetes-related outcomes. However, it is less clear how secure messaging supports diabetes management.

OBJECTIVE

We examined secure message topics between patients and clinical team members in a national sample of veterans with type 2 diabetes to understand use of secure messaging for diabetes management and potential associations with glycemic control.

METHODS

We surveyed and analyzed the content of secure messages between 448 US Veterans Health Administration patients with type 2 diabetes and their clinical teams. We also explored the relationship between secure messaging content and glycemic control.

RESULTS

Explicit diabetes-related content was the most frequent topic (72.1% of participants), followed by blood pressure (31.7% of participants). Among diabetes-related conversations, 90.7% of patients discussed medication renewals or refills. More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 or more threads about blood pressure compared to those with poor control (37.5% vs 27.2%, P=.02). More patients with good glycemic control engaged in 1 more threads intended to share information with their clinical team about an aspect of their diabetes management compared to those with poor control (23.7% vs 12.4%, P=.009).

CONCLUSIONS

There were few differences in secure messaging topics between patients in good versus poor glycemic control. Those in good control were more likely to engage in informational messages to their team and send messages related to blood pressure. It may be that the specific topic content of the secure messages may not be that important for glycemic control. Simply making it easier for patients to communicate with their clinical teams may be the driving influence between associations previously reported in the literature between secure messaging and positive clinical outcomes in diabetes.

摘要

背景

使用安全消息传递与改善糖尿病相关结局有关。然而,安全消息传递如何支持糖尿病管理尚不太清楚。

目的

我们在一个全国性的2型糖尿病退伍军人样本中,研究了患者与临床团队成员之间的安全消息主题,以了解安全消息传递在糖尿病管理中的应用以及与血糖控制的潜在关联。

方法

我们对448名美国退伍军人健康管理局的2型糖尿病患者与其临床团队之间的安全消息内容进行了调查和分析。我们还探讨了安全消息内容与血糖控制之间的关系。

结果

明确的糖尿病相关内容是最常见的主题(72.1%的参与者),其次是血压(31.7%的参与者)。在与糖尿病相关的对话中,90.7%的患者讨论了药物续订或补充。与血糖控制不佳的患者相比,血糖控制良好的患者更多地参与了1个或更多关于血压的话题讨论(37.5%对27.2%,P=0.02)。与血糖控制不佳的患者相比,血糖控制良好的患者更多地参与了1个或更多旨在与临床团队分享其糖尿病管理某方面信息的话题讨论(23.7%对12.4%,P=0.009)。

结论

血糖控制良好与不佳的患者在安全消息主题方面差异不大。控制良好的患者更有可能向其团队发送信息性消息并发送与血压相关的消息。安全消息的具体主题内容可能对血糖控制并非那么重要。简单地让患者更容易与临床团队沟通,可能是先前文献报道的安全消息传递与糖尿病积极临床结局之间关联的驱动因素。

相似文献

1
Secure Messaging for Diabetes Management: Content Analysis.
JMIR Diabetes. 2023 Mar 23;8:e40272. doi: 10.2196/40272.
7
Understanding Secure Messaging in the Inpatient Environment: A New Avenue for Communication and Patient Engagement.
Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Oct;9(4):860-868. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1675814. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
9
Secure Messaging, Diabetes Self-management, and the Importance of Patient Autonomy: a Mixed Methods Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2955-2962. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05834-x. Epub 2020 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Discussions of Cannabis Over Patient Portal Secure Messaging: Content Analysis.
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 12;26:e63311. doi: 10.2196/63311.
2
Implementation and Evaluation of a mHealth-Based Community Health Worker Feedback Loop for Hispanics with and at Risk for Diabetes.
J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Feb;39(2):229-238. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08434-7. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Patient portal engagement and diabetes management among new portal users in the Veterans Health Administration.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2176-2183. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab115.
4
Secure Messaging, Diabetes Self-management, and the Importance of Patient Autonomy: a Mixed Methods Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):2955-2962. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05834-x. Epub 2020 May 21.
5
Look Who's Talking: Application of a Theory-Based Taxonomy to Patient-Clinician E-mail Messages.
Telemed J E Health. 2020 Nov;26(11):1345-1352. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2019.0192. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Abridged for Primary Care Providers.
Clin Diabetes. 2020 Jan;38(1):10-38. doi: 10.2337/cd20-as01.
7
Interventions to increase patient portal use in vulnerable populations: a systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Aug 1;26(8-9):855-870. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz023.
8
Differences in Rural and Urban Health Information Access and Use.
J Rural Health. 2019 Jun;35(3):405-417. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12335. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
9
10
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Veterans, United States, 2005-2014.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Dec 14;14:E135. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.170230.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验