• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗保健中按绩效付费计划的有效性:以终末期肾病质量激励计划为例。

Pay-for-performance programs effectiveness in healthcare: the case of the end-stage renal disease quality incentive program.

作者信息

Piri Saeed

机构信息

Department of Operations and Business Analytics, Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR, 97403, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):221-236. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01582-x. Epub 2023 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1007/s10198-023-01582-x
PMID:36966480
Abstract

This paper focuses on Medicare's End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program (QIP). QIP aims to promote high-quality services in outpatient dialysis facilities by tying their payments to their performance on pre-specified quality measures. In this paper, employing principal-agent theory, we examine the effectiveness of QIP by exploring the changes in various clinical/operational measures when they become a part of the program as a performance measure. We study five QIP quality measures; two are operational: hospitalization and readmission. And three others are clinical: blood transfusion, hypercalcemia, and dialysis adequacy. Overall, we observe a significant improvement in all QIP quality measures after being included in the program, except for readmission. We recommend adjusting the weight and redesigning the readmission measure for Medicare to incentivize providers to reduce readmission. We also discuss establishing care coordination and employing data-driven clinical decision support systems as opportunities for dialysis facilities to improve the care delivery process.

摘要

本文聚焦于医疗保险的终末期肾病质量激励计划(QIP)。QIP旨在通过将门诊透析设施的支付与它们在预先指定的质量指标上的表现挂钩,来促进高质量服务。在本文中,我们运用委托代理理论,通过探究各种临床/运营指标在成为该计划的绩效指标时的变化,来检验QIP的有效性。我们研究了五项QIP质量指标;其中两项是运营指标:住院率和再入院率。另外三项是临床指标:输血、高钙血症和透析充分性。总体而言,我们观察到所有QIP质量指标在被纳入该计划后都有显著改善,但再入院率除外。我们建议调整权重并重新设计医疗保险的再入院指标,以激励医疗服务提供者降低再入院率。我们还讨论了建立护理协调以及采用数据驱动的临床决策支持系统,将其作为透析设施改善护理提供过程的契机。

相似文献

1
Pay-for-performance programs effectiveness in healthcare: the case of the end-stage renal disease quality incentive program.医疗保健中按绩效付费计划的有效性:以终末期肾病质量激励计划为例。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Mar;25(2):221-236. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01582-x. Epub 2023 Mar 26.
2
Association between Freestanding Dialysis Facility Size and Medicare Quality Incentive Program Performance Scores.独立透析中心规模与医疗保险质量激励计划绩效评分之间的关联。
Am J Nephrol. 2019;49(1):64-73. doi: 10.1159/000495262. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
3
Freestanding Dialysis Facility Quality Incentive Program Scores and Mortality Among Incident Dialysis Patients in the United States.美国独立透析中心质量激励计划评分与新透析患者死亡率的关系
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Feb;75(2):177-186. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
The QIP: will it improve dialysis care? An overview.质量改进计划(QIP):它会改善透析护理吗?概述。
Nephrol News Issues. 2012 Jan;26(1):20, 22-4, 26.
5
The ESRD Quality Incentive Program-Can We Bridge the Chasm?终末期肾病质量激励计划——我们能弥合差距吗?
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Jun;28(6):1697-1706. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016101079. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
6
The Role of Social Risk Factors in Dialysis Quality and Patient Outcomes Under a Medicare Quality Incentive Program.社会风险因素在医疗保险质量激励计划下对透析质量和患者预后的作用。
Med Care. 2022 Oct 1;60(10):735-742. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001750. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
7
Medicare program; end-stage renal disease quality incentive program. Final rule.医疗保险计划;终末期肾病质量激励计划。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 Jan 5;76(3):627-46.
8
Meeting the 2012 QIP (Quality Incentive Program) clinical measures: strategies for dialysis centers.满足 2012 年 QIP(质量激励计划)临床指标:透析中心的策略。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 Nov;60(5 Suppl 1):S5-13; quiz S14-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.002.
9
Mortality Risk of Patients Treated in Dialysis Facilities with Payment Reductions under ESRD Quality Incentive Program.接受 ESRD 质量激励计划下支付削减的透析设施治疗的患者的死亡率风险。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023 Mar 1;18(3):356-362. doi: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000079. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
10
Medicare Program; End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, Coverage and Payment for Renal Dialysis Services Furnished to Individuals With Acute Kidney Injury, End-Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program, Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies Competitive Bidding Program Bid Surety Bonds, State Licensure and Appeals Process for Breach of Contract Actions, Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supplies Competitive Bidding Program and Fee Schedule Adjustments, Access to Care Issues for Durable Medical Equipment; and the Comprehensive End-Stage Renal Disease Care Model. Final rule.医疗保险计划;终末期肾病前瞻性支付系统、为急性肾损伤患者提供的肾透析服务的覆盖范围和支付、终末期肾病质量激励计划、耐用医疗设备、假肢、矫形器及用品竞争性投标计划投标保证金、违反合同行为的州许可和上诉程序、耐用医疗设备、假肢、矫形器及用品竞争性投标计划和费用表调整、耐用医疗设备的就医问题;以及终末期肾病综合护理模式。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2016 Nov 4;81(214):77834-969.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart failure management in dialysis patients: Many treatment options with no clear evidence.透析患者的心力衰竭管理:有许多治疗选择,但缺乏明确证据。
Semin Dial. 2020 May;33(3):198-208. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12878. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
2
Measuring Quality in Kidney Care: An Evaluation of Existing Quality Metrics and Approach to Facilitating Improvements in Care Delivery.衡量肾脏护理质量:现有质量指标的评估以及促进护理提供改进的方法。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Mar;31(3):602-614. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2019090869. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
3
Are Dialysis Facility Quality Incentive Program Scores Associated With Patient Survival?
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Feb;75(2):155-157. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.013. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
US Renal Data System 2019 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.美国肾脏数据系统2019年年报:美国肾脏疾病流行病学
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Jan;75(1 Suppl 1):A6-A7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.003. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
5
Freestanding Dialysis Facility Quality Incentive Program Scores and Mortality Among Incident Dialysis Patients in the United States.美国独立透析中心质量激励计划评分与新透析患者死亡率的关系
Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Feb;75(2):177-186. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.023. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
6
Prior Hospitalization Burden and the Relatedness of 30-Day Readmissions in Patients Receiving Hemodialysis.接受血液透析患者的住院负担与 30 天再入院的相关性。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019 Feb;30(2):323-335. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2018080858. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
7
Development of an International Standard Set of Value-Based Outcome Measures for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Report of the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) CKD Working Group.开发一套基于价值的国际慢性肾脏病患者结局测量标准集:国际健康结局测量联盟(ICHOM)慢性肾脏病工作组的报告。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Mar;73(3):372-384. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.10.007. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
8
Post-hospitalization dialysis facility processes of care and hospital readmissions among hemodialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study.血液透析患者出院后透析设施的护理流程与再入院情况:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Nephrol. 2018 Jul 31;19(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0983-5.
9
Transformation of the Health Care Industry: Curb Your Enthusiasm?医疗保健行业的变革:适可而止?
Milbank Q. 2018 Mar;96(1):57-109. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12312.
10
Decreasing hospitalizations in patients on hemodialysis: Time for a paradigm shift.减少血液透析患者的住院率:是时候进行范式转变了。
Semin Dial. 2018 May;31(3):278-288. doi: 10.1111/sdi.12675. Epub 2018 Feb 6.