Talens Amparo, LÓpez-Pintor Elsa, Guilabert Mercedes, Cantó-Sancho Natalia, Aznar María Teresa, Lumbreras Blanca
Pharmacy Department, Elda General University Hospital, Elda, Spain.
Department of Engineering, Area of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain.
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1113898. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1113898. eCollection 2023.
Lack of adherence to Oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) treatment has important clinical, social and economic consequences. To develop and validate a novel instrument for assessing adherence to OAAs, based on the reported experiences of people with cancer in relation to their treatment and the opinions of the healthcare professionals who care for them. We performed a multicenter validation study of a scale designed to assess adherence to OAAs. First, a steering committee developed the items for an initial scale, based on the results of a qualitative study that evaluated patients' and professionals' experiences with this treatment. We then assessed the validity and reliability of the initial scale in a sample of 268 outpatients with cancer who received their OAAs from four Spanish hospitals. The mean age of the sample of 268 outpatients was 64.1 (standard deviation [SD] 12.4) years, and 47% of participants were women. With the results of this analysis, we developed the EXPAD-ANEO scale, which has 2 factors, one for beliefs and expectations and another for behavior. Both factors explain 52% of the explained common variance. Good reliability was obtained, with a McDonald's omega of 0.7 for the first factor and 0.6 for the second factor. The fit indices were optimal (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.02, Comparative Fit Index = 0.99, Tucker Lexis Index = 0.99 and Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual = 0.03), which verifies the appropriateness of the items to the model. We measured EXPAD-ANEO criterion validity against pill count, obtaining a specificity of 80%. We measured convergent validity with the Morisky-Green test and found a significant association ( < 0.001). We measured divergent validity with questions on health literacy from the 16-item European Health Literacy Survey and found no correlation ( = 0.153). EXPAD-ANEO is the first validated instrument for evaluating patients' experiences with and adherence to OAAs, providing valuable information that can help health professionals to establish individual strategies or collective programs for improving therapeutic results and reducing healthcare costs.
不坚持口服抗肿瘤药物(OAA)治疗会产生重要的临床、社会和经济后果。为了基于癌症患者关于其治疗的报告经历以及照顾他们的医护人员的意见,开发并验证一种评估对OAA依从性的新型工具。我们对一个旨在评估对OAA依从性的量表进行了多中心验证研究。首先,一个指导委员会根据一项定性研究的结果制定了初始量表的项目,该定性研究评估了患者和专业人员在这种治疗方面的经历。然后,我们在来自四家西班牙医院接受OAA治疗的268名癌症门诊患者样本中评估了初始量表的有效性和可靠性。268名门诊患者样本的平均年龄为64.1岁(标准差[SD]为12.4),47%的参与者为女性。根据该分析结果,我们开发了EXPAD - ANEO量表,它有两个因素,一个用于信念和期望,另一个用于行为。两个因素解释了52%的共同方差。获得了良好的信度,第一个因素的麦克唐纳ω系数为0.7,第二个因素为0.6。拟合指数是最优的(近似均方根误差 = 0.02,比较拟合指数 = 0.99,塔克 - 刘易斯指数 = 0.99,标准化均方根残差 = 0.03),这验证了项目与模型的适配性。我们通过清点药片数量来测量EXPAD - ANEO的效标效度,得到的特异性为80%。我们用莫利斯基 - 格林测试测量了收敛效度,发现有显著关联(<0.001)。我们用16项欧洲健康素养调查问卷中关于健康素养的问题测量了区分效度,发现没有相关性(=0.153)。EXPAD - ANEO是第一个经过验证的用于评估患者对OAA的体验和依从性的工具,提供了有价值的信息,有助于医护人员制定个人策略或集体项目,以改善治疗效果并降低医疗成本。