• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Common Sounds Audiograms: Quantitative Analyses and Recommendations.常见听力图:定量分析与建议
Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 22;44(Suppl 1):S49-S63. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764128. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
What Are Parents' Experiences With Their Child's Hearing Aid Use in the First 5 Years?家长在孩子使用助听器的前 5 年中有哪些体验?
Ear Hear. 2023;44(4):816-828. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001332. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
3
The Effectiveness of Parental Questionnaires in the Assessment of Speech-Language and Auditory Function in Children.家长问卷在评估儿童言语-语言和听觉功能中的有效性
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2017;69(5-6):261-270. doi: 10.1159/000488054. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
The child doesn't hear? On breaking bad news as perceived by parents and audiologists.孩子听不见?关于父母和听力学家所感知的坏消息告知问题。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;112:113-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.06.044. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Audiologist Practices: Parent Hearing Aid Education and Support.听力学家的实践:家长助听器教育与支持
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Apr;27(4):324-32. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15007.
6
Hearing Thresholds, Speech Recognition, and Audibility as Indicators for Modifying Intervention in Children With Hearing Aids.助听后阈值、言语识别和可听度作为调整儿童助听干预措施的指标。
Ear Hear. 2023;44(4):787-802. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001328. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
7
Beliefs and Self-Efficacy of Parents of Young Children with Hearing Loss.听力损失幼儿家长的信念与自我效能感
J Early Hear Detect Interv. 2020 May;5(1):73-85.
8
Counseling in Pediatric Audiology: Audiologists' Perceptions, Confidence, and Training.儿科听力学咨询:听力学家的认知、信心与培训
J Am Acad Audiol. 2019 Jan;30(1):66-77. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17087. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
9
Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.婴幼儿辅助言语可听度的纵向预测因素
Ear Hear. 2015 Nov-Dec;36 Suppl 1(0 1):24S-37S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000211.
10
Comparison of parent and child reports of emotional trauma symptoms in pediatric outpatient settings.儿科门诊环境中父母与儿童关于情感创伤症状报告的比较。
Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):e582-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2201.

本文引用的文献

1
Average Speech Levels and Spectra in Various Speaking/Listening Conditions: A Summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) Report.不同言语/聆听条件下的平均言语水平和频谱:皮尔逊、贝内特与菲德尔(1977年)报告综述
Am J Audiol. 1998 Oct 1;7(2):21-25. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(1998/012).
2
Stimuli and normative data for detection of Ling-6 sounds in hearing level.听力水平下Ling-6声音检测的刺激和标准数据。
Am J Audiol. 2012 Dec;21(2):232-41. doi: 10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0020). Epub 2012 Jul 30.
3
Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS).国际语音测试信号(ISTS)的开发与分析。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Dec;49(12):891-903. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2010.506889.
4
Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: implications for amplification in children.耳部语音的频谱特征:对儿童听力放大的影响。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003 Jun;46(3):649-57. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2003/051).
5
Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives.英语擦音的声学特征。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Sep;108(3 Pt 1):1252-63. doi: 10.1121/1.1288413.
6
Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels.美式英语元音的声学特征。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 May;97(5 Pt 1):3099-111. doi: 10.1121/1.411872.
7
Distribution of short-term rms levels in conversational speech.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Sep;84(3):1100-4. doi: 10.1121/1.396697.
8
Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1975 Sep-Oct;84(5 pt 2 Suppl 23):1-40.
9
The hearing of speech during language acquisition.语言习得过程中对言语的听觉。
Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1978 Oct;11(3):631-50.

常见听力图:定量分析与建议

Common Sounds Audiograms: Quantitative Analyses and Recommendations.

作者信息

Hillis Cory L, Uchanski Rosalie M, Davidson Lisa S

机构信息

Program in Audiology and Communication Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

Department of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

出版信息

Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 22;44(Suppl 1):S49-S63. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764128. eCollection 2023 Feb.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1764128
PMID:36970646
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10033193/
Abstract

A counseling tool routinely used by pediatric audiologists and early intervention-specialists is the often-named "common sounds audiogram" (CSA). Typically, a child's hearing detection thresholds are plotted on the CSA to indicate that child's audibility of speech and environmental sounds. Importantly, the CSA may be the first item that parents see when their child's hearing loss is explained. Thus, the accuracy of the CSA and its associated counseling information are integral to the parents' understanding of what their child can hear and to the parents' role in the child's future hearing care and interventions. Currently available CSAs were collected from professional societies, early intervention providers, device manufacturers, etc., and analyzed (  = 36). Analysis included quantification of sound elements, presence of counseling information, attribution of acoustic measurements, and errors. The analyses show that currently-available CSAs are wildly inconsistent as a group, not scientifically justified, and omit important information for counseling and interpretation. Variations found among currently available CSAs can lead to very different parental interpretations of the impact of a child's hearing loss on his/her access to sounds, especially spoken language. Such variations, presumably, could also lead to different recommendations regarding intervention and hearing devices. Recommendations are outlined for the development of a new, standard CSA.

摘要

儿科听力学家和早期干预专家经常使用的一种咨询工具通常被称为“常见声音听力图”(CSA)。通常,会将儿童的听力检测阈值绘制在CSA上,以表明该儿童对语音和环境声音的可听度。重要的是,当向家长解释孩子的听力损失情况时,CSA可能是他们首先看到的内容。因此,CSA及其相关咨询信息的准确性对于家长理解孩子能听到什么以及家长在孩子未来听力护理和干预中所起的作用至关重要。目前可用的CSA是从专业协会、早期干预机构、设备制造商等收集而来,并进行了分析(n = 36)。分析包括声音元素的量化、咨询信息的存在情况、声学测量的归属以及误差。分析表明,目前可用的CSA作为一个整体非常不一致,缺乏科学依据,并遗漏了咨询和解释所需的重要信息。目前可用的CSA之间存在的差异可能会导致家长对孩子听力损失对其获取声音(尤其是口语)的影响产生非常不同的理解。据推测,这种差异也可能导致关于干预和听力设备的不同建议。文中概述了开发新的标准CSA的建议。