Aragonés-Calleja Miriam, Sánchez-Martínez Vanessa
Mental Health Department, Hospital Padre Jofre, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing and Chiropody, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Oct;30(5):983-993. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12921. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Coercive measures represent an ethical conflict because they limit the person's freedom, compromising their personal autonomy, self-determination and fundamental rights. The reduction of the use of coercive measures implies not only regulations and mental health systems, but also cultural aspects, such as societal beliefs, attitudes, and values. There is evidence about the professionals' views on coercion in acute mental health care units and community settings, but they remain unexplored in inpatient rehabilitation units. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: The knowledge about coercion varied from not knowing at all the meaning of the word, to a proper description of the phenomenon. Coercive measures are considered a necessary evil or normalized in mental health care and considered implicit to daily practice. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: The perceptions and attitudes towards coercion might be influenced by the knowledge about the phenomenon. Training of mental health nursing staff in non-coercive practice could help professionals to detect, be conscious towards, and question coercive measures, thus orienting them to the effective implementation of interventions or programmes with evidenced effectiveness to reduce them.
INTRODUCTION: Creating a therapeutic and safe milieu with the minimum coercive measures requires knowing professionals' perceptions and attitudes towards coercion, but they remain unexplored in medium and long-stay inpatient psychiatric rehabilitation units.
To explore the knowledge, perception and experience of coercion among nursing staff at a rehabilitation medium-stay mental health unit (MSMHU) in Eastern Spain.
Qualitative phenomenological study including 28 face-to-face, semi-structured interviews based on a script. Data were analysed using content analysis.
Two main themes were found: (1) therapeutic relationship and treatment in the MSMHU, which included three subthemes: qualities of the professionals for building the therapeutic relationship; perceptions about the persons admitted to the MSMHU; views of the therapeutic relationship and treatment in the MSMHU; (2) Coercion at the MSMHU, comprising five subthemes: professional knowledge; general aspects; emotional impact of coercion; opinions; alternatives.
Coercive measures are often normalized in mental health care and considered implicit to daily practice. A proportion of participants who did not know what coercion is.
Knowledge about coercion might influence attitudes towards coercion. Mental health nursing staff could benefit from formal training in non-coercive practice, facilitating the operative implementation of effective interventions or programmes.
关于该主题已知的信息有哪些?:强制措施存在伦理冲突,因为它们限制了个人自由,损害了个人自主性、自决权和基本权利。减少强制措施的使用不仅意味着规章制度和精神卫生系统的变革,还涉及文化层面,如社会信仰、态度和价值观。有证据表明专业人员对急性精神卫生保健单位和社区环境中的强制手段的看法,但在住院康复单位中这些看法仍未得到探讨。本文对现有知识的补充是什么?:关于强制手段的知识差异很大,从根本不知道这个词的含义到对该现象的恰当描述。强制措施在精神卫生保健中被视为一种必要的恶或已常态化,并被认为是日常实践中固有的一部分。对实践有何启示?:对强制手段的认知和态度可能会受到对该现象的了解的影响。对精神卫生护理人员进行非强制实践培训可以帮助专业人员察觉、意识到并质疑强制措施,从而引导他们有效实施有证据支持的减少强制措施的干预措施或项目。
引言:以最少的强制措施营造一个治疗性且安全的环境需要了解专业人员对强制手段的认知和态度,但在中长期住院精神科康复单位中这些认知和态度仍未得到探讨。
探讨西班牙东部一家中等停留期精神卫生康复单位(MSMHU)护理人员对强制手段的了解、认知和体验。
采用定性现象学研究方法,基于一份脚本进行了28次面对面的半结构化访谈。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析。
发现了两个主要主题:(1)MSMHU中的治疗关系和治疗,其中包括三个子主题:建立治疗关系的专业人员素质;对入住MSMHU人员的认知;对MSMHU中治疗关系和治疗的看法;(2)MSMHU中的强制手段,包括五个子主题:专业知识;一般方面;强制手段的情感影响;观点;替代方法。
强制措施在精神卫生保健中常常被常态化,并被认为是日常实践中固有的一部分。一部分参与者不知道什么是强制手段。
关于强制手段的知识可能会影响对强制手段的态度。精神卫生护理人员可以从非强制实践的正规培训中受益,这有助于有效干预措施或项目的实际实施。