Suppr超能文献

在急诊科,给报告有青霉素过敏史的患者使用β-内酰胺类抗生素。

Administration of β-lactam antibiotics to patients with reported penicillin allergy in the emergency department.

机构信息

Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, 401 Broadway, Camden, NJ 08103, USA.

Philadelphia College of Pharmacy, University of the Sciences, 600 South 43rd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:119-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.013. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

β-lactam antibiotics are amongst the most commonly prescribed medications in the Emergency Department (ED) due to their role in empiric sepsis therapy; however, inferior therapeutic options are often utilized due to a reported allergy; penicillin (PCN) being most frequent. In the United States, 10% of the population endorses an allergic reaction to PCN while <1% experience IgE-mediated reactions. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency and outcome of patients in the ED whose PCN allergies were challenged with β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients in the ED at an academic medical center aged ≥18, and who received a β-lactam despite a reported PCN allergy between January 2015 and December 2019. Patients who did not receive a β-lactam or did not report a PCN allergy prior to administration were excluded. The primary outcome was the frequency of IgE-mediated reactions in response to β-lactam administration. A secondary outcome assessed the frequency of continuation of β-lactams upon admission from the ED.

RESULTS

819 patients were included (66% female) with prior reported PCN reactions: hives (22.5%), rash (15.4%), swelling (6.2%), anaphylaxis (3.5%), other (12.1%), or undocumented on medical electronic record (40.3%). No patients experienced an IgE-mediated reaction to the β-lactam administered in the ED. Previously reported allergies had no effect on the continuation of β-lactams when admitted or discharged (OR: 1, 95% CI: 0.7-1.44). Patients who had a history of an IgE-mediated penicillin allergy were frequently continued (77%) on a β-lactam after leaving the ED via admission or discharge.

CONCLUSION

β-lactam administration in patients with previously reported PCN allergies did not result in any IgE-mediated reactions nor in an increase in adverse reactions. Our data contributes to the body of evidence that supports the administration of β-lactams to patients with documented PCN allergies.

摘要

背景

β-内酰胺类抗生素在急诊科(ED)中是最常被开的药物之一,因为它们在经验性脓毒症治疗中发挥作用;然而,由于报告的过敏反应,往往会选择疗效较差的药物。青霉素(PCN)是最常见的过敏药物。在美国,10%的人群对 PCN 过敏,而<1%的人对 IgE 介导的反应过敏。本研究旨在评估急诊科中 PCN 过敏患者接受β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗时的频率和结局。

方法

我们对 2015 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间在学术医疗中心急诊科就诊且年龄≥18 岁的患者进行了回顾性病历审查,这些患者在报告 PCN 过敏的情况下接受了β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗。未接受β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗或在给药前未报告 PCN 过敏的患者被排除在外。主要结局是β-内酰胺类抗生素给药后 IgE 介导反应的频率。次要结局评估了从急诊科入院时β-内酰胺类抗生素的继续使用频率。

结果

共纳入 819 例患者(66%为女性),先前报告的 PCN 反应为:荨麻疹(22.5%)、皮疹(15.4%)、肿胀(6.2%)、过敏反应(3.5%)、其他(12.1%)或电子病历未记录(40.3%)。没有患者对接受的β-内酰胺类抗生素出现 IgE 介导的反应。先前报告的过敏反应对入院或出院时β-内酰胺类抗生素的继续使用没有影响(OR:1,95%CI:0.7-1.44)。有 IgE 介导的青霉素过敏史的患者在离开 ED 时,通过入院或出院,经常继续(77%)使用β-内酰胺类抗生素。

结论

在先前报告有 PCN 过敏反应的患者中,β-内酰胺类抗生素的给药并未导致任何 IgE 介导的反应,也未增加不良反应。我们的数据为支持对有记录的 PCN 过敏反应的患者使用β-内酰胺类抗生素提供了更多证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验