Suppr超能文献

新辅助放疗设施类型影响食管癌手术后吻合口并发症。

Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Facility Type Affects Anastomotic Complications After Esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA.

Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jul;27(7):1313-1320. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05660-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy is a complex oncologic surgery that results in lower perioperative morbidity and mortality when performed in high-volume hospitals by experienced surgeons; however, limited data exists evaluating the importance of neoadjuvant radiotherapy delivery at high- versus low-volume centers. We sought to compare postoperative toxicity among patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy delivered at an academic medical center (AMC) versus community medical centers (CMC).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy for locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer at an academic medical center between 2008 and 2018 were reviewed. Associations between patient factors and treatment-related toxicities were calculated in univariate (UVA) and multivariable analyses (MVA).

RESULTS

One hundred forty-seven consecutive patients were identified: 89 CMC and 58 AMC. Median follow-up was 30 months (0.33-124 months). Most patients were male (86%) with adenocarcinoma (90%) located in the distal esophagus or GEJ (95%). Median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy between groups. Radiotherapy at CMCs resulted in higher rates of re-operation after esophagectomy (18% vs 7%, p = 0.055) and increased rates of anastomotic leak (38% vs 17%, p < 0.01). On MVA, radiation at a CMC remained predictive of anastomotic leak (OR 6.13, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Esophageal cancer patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy had higher rates of anastomotic leaks when radiotherapy was completed at a community medical center versus academic medical center. Explanations for these differences are uncertain but further exploratory analyses regarding dosimetry and radiation field size are warranted.

摘要

背景

食管切除术是一种复杂的肿瘤学手术,由经验丰富的外科医生在高容量医院进行时,围手术期发病率和死亡率较低;然而,评估在高容量与低容量中心进行新辅助放疗的重要性的数据有限。我们旨在比较在学术医疗中心(AMC)和社区医疗中心(CMC)接受术前放疗的患者的术后毒性。

方法

回顾了 2008 年至 2018 年在学术医疗中心接受局部晚期食管或胃食管交界处(GEJ)癌手术的连续患者。在单变量(UVA)和多变量分析(MVA)中计算了患者因素与治疗相关毒性之间的关联。

结果

确定了 147 例连续患者:89 例 CMC 和 58 例 AMC。中位随访时间为 30 个月(0.33-124 个月)。大多数患者为男性(86%),腺癌(90%)位于食管下段或 GEJ(95%)。两组之间的中位放疗剂量为 50.4Gy。在 CMC 进行放疗后,食管切除术后再次手术的发生率更高(18% vs. 7%,p=0.055),吻合口漏的发生率也更高(38% vs. 17%,p<0.01)。在多变量分析中,在 CMC 进行放疗仍然是吻合口漏的预测因素(OR 6.13,p<0.01)。

结论

在社区医疗中心接受术前放疗的食管癌患者在接受社区医疗中心的放疗时,吻合口漏的发生率更高。这些差异的解释尚不确定,但需要进一步进行关于剂量学和放射野大小的探索性分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验