Suppr超能文献

使用离体光学成像技术实时评估根治性膀胱切除术中的尿道和输尿管:一种评估新鲜未固定手术切缘的新方法。

Real-Time Urethral and Ureteral Assessment during Radical Cystectomy Using Ex-Vivo Optical Imaging: A Novel Technique for the Evaluation of Fresh Unfixed Surgical Margins.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.

Department of Urology, IRCCS "Regina Elena" National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 15;30(3):3421-3431. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030259.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our study aims to assess the feasibility and the reproducibility of fluorescent confocal microscopy (FCM) real-time assessment of urethral and ureteral margins during open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer (BCa).

METHODS

From May 2020 to January 2022, 46 patients underwent ORC with intraoperative FCM evaluation. Each specimen was intraoperatively stained for histopathological analysis using FCM, analyzed as a frozen section (FSA), and sent for traditional H&E examination. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and the negative predictive value (NPV) of FCM and FSA were assessed and compared with H&E for urethral and ureteral margins separately.

RESULTS

The agreement was evaluated through Cohen's κ statistic. Urethral diagnostic agreement between FCM and FSA showed a κ = 0.776 ( < 0.001), while between FCM and H&E, the agreement was κ = 0.691 ( < 0.001). With regard to ureteral margins, an overall agreement of κ = 0.712 ( < 0.001) between FCM and FSA and of κ = 0.481 ( < 0.001) between FCM and H&E was found.

CONCLUSIONS

FCM proved to be a safe, feasible, and reproducible method for the intraoperative assessment of urethral and ureteral margins during ORC. Compared to standard FSA, FCM showed adequate diagnostic performance in detecting urethral and ureteral malignant involvement.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估荧光共聚焦显微镜(FCM)实时评估膀胱癌(BCa)根治性膀胱切除术(ORC)中尿道和输尿管边缘的可行性和可重复性。

方法

2020 年 5 月至 2022 年 1 月,46 例患者接受了 ORC 手术,并进行了术中 FCM 评估。每个标本均通过 FCM 进行术中组织病理学分析染色,作为冷冻切片(FSA)进行分析,并送传统 H&E 检查。分别评估 FCM 和 FSA 对尿道和输尿管边缘的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV),并与 H&E 进行比较。

结果

通过 Cohen's κ 统计评估一致性。FCM 和 FSA 之间的尿道诊断一致性 κ = 0.776(<0.001),而 FCM 和 H&E 之间的一致性为 κ = 0.691(<0.001)。对于输尿管边缘,FCM 和 FSA 之间的总体一致性为 κ = 0.712(<0.001),FCM 和 H&E 之间的一致性为 κ = 0.481(<0.001)。

结论

FCM 被证明是一种安全、可行和可重复的方法,可用于 ORC 术中评估尿道和输尿管边缘。与标准 FSA 相比,FCM 在检测尿道和输尿管恶性受累方面具有足够的诊断性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9719/10047830/6adb3bca5362/curroncol-30-00259-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验