Suppr超能文献

“仅急诊”血液透析对医院成本和资源利用的影响。

The Impact of "Emergency-only" Hemodialysis on Hospital Cost and Resource Utilization.

机构信息

Emory University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Emory University, Department of Nephrology, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 24;24(2):206-209. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.11.58360.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Undocumented immigrants are excluded from benefits that help compensate for scheduled outpatient hemodialysis (HD), compelling them to use emergency departments (ED) for HD. Consequently, these patients can receive "emergency-only" HD after presenting to the ED with critical illness due to untimely dialysis. Our objective was to describe the impact of emergency-only HD on hospital cost and resource utilization in a large academic health system that includes public and private hospitals.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study of health and accounting records took place at five teaching hospitals (one public, four private) over 24 consecutive months from January 2019 to December 2020. All patients had emergency and/or observation visits, renal failure codes (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Rev, Clinical Modification), emergency HD procedure codes, and an insurance status of "self-pay." Primary outcomes included frequency of visits, total cost, and length of stay (LOS) in the observation unit. Secondary objectives included evaluating the variation in resource use between persons and comparing these metrics between the private and public hospitals.

RESULTS

A total of 15,682 emergency-only HD visits were made by 214 unique persons, for an average of 36.6 visits per person per year. The average cost per visit was $1,363, for an annual total cost of $10.7 million. The average LOS was 11.4 hours. This resulted in 89,027 observation-hours annually, or 3,709 observation-days. The public hospital dialyzed more patients compared to the private hospitals, especially due to repeat visits by the same persons.

CONCLUSION

Health policies that limit hemodialysis of uninsured patients to the ED are associated with high healthcare costs and a misuse of limited ED and hospital resources.

摘要

简介

无证移民被排除在有助于补偿定期门诊血液透析(HD)的福利之外,迫使他们在急诊部(ED)进行 HD。因此,这些患者在因透析不及时出现危急疾病后到 ED 就诊时,只能接受“急诊专用”HD。我们的目的是描述在一个包括公立和私立医院的大型学术医疗系统中,急诊专用 HD 对医院成本和资源利用的影响。

方法

这项在五个教学医院(一个公立,四个私立)进行的回顾性观察性研究,时间跨度为 24 个月,从 2019 年 1 月到 2020 年 12 月。所有患者均有急诊和/或观察就诊、肾衰竭代码(国际疾病分类,第 10 次修订版,临床修正)、急诊 HD 程序代码和“自付”保险状态。主要结果包括就诊频率、总费用和观察病房的住院时间(LOS)。次要目标包括评估资源使用的个体间差异,并比较私立和公立医院的这些指标。

结果

共有 214 名患者进行了 15682 次急诊专用 HD 治疗,平均每人每年 36.6 次。每次就诊的平均费用为 1363 美元,年总费用为 1070 万美元。平均 LOS 为 11.4 小时。这导致每年有 89027 小时的观察时间,或 3709 天的观察时间。与私立医院相比,公立医院透析的患者更多,尤其是因为同一患者的重复就诊。

结论

将未参保患者的血液透析仅限于 ED 的卫生政策与高昂的医疗保健成本以及对有限的 ED 和医院资源的滥用有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验