Karlsson Jan Olof G, Jynge Per, Ignarro Louis J
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Division of Clinical Chemistry and Pharmacology, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Department of Radiology, Innlandet Trust Hospital, Gjøvik Hospital, 2819 Gjøvik, Norway.
Antioxidants (Basel). 2023 Mar 1;12(3):608. doi: 10.3390/antiox12030608.
Disappointing results from the POLAR A and M phase III trials involving colorectal cancer patients on chemotherapy with FOLFOX6 in curative (A) and palliative (M) settings have been reported by the principal investigators and the sponsor (PledPharma AB/Egetis Therapeutics AB). FOLFOX6, oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), possesses superior tumoricidal activity in comparison to 5-FU alone, but suffers seriously from dose-limiting platinum-associated Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN). The aim of the POLAR trials was to demonstrate that PledOx [calmangafodipir; CaMn(DPDP)] reduced the incidence of persistent CIPN from 40% to 20%. However, this assumption was based on "explorative" data in the preceding PLIANT phase II trial, which did not mirror the expected incidence of unwanted toxicity in placebo patients. In POLAR A and M, the assessment of PledOx efficacy was conducted in patients that received at least six cycles of FOLFOX6, enabling analyses of efficacy in 239 A and 88 M patients. Instead of a hypothesized improvement from 40% to 20% incidence of persistent CIPN in the PledOx group, i.e., a 50% improvement, the real outcome was the opposite, i.e., an about 50% worsening in this bothersome toxicity. Mechanisms that may explain the disastrous outcome, with a statistically significant number of patients being seriously injured after having received PledOx, indicate interactions between two redox active metal cations, Pt (oxaliplatin) and Mn (PledOx). A far from surprising causal relationship that escaped prior detection by the study group and the sponsor. Most importantly, recently published data (ref 1) unequivocally indicate that the PLIANT study was not suited to base clinical phase III studies on. In conclusion, the POLAR and PLIANT trials show that PledOx and related manganese-containing compounds are unsuited for co-treatment with platinum-containing compounds. For use as a therapeutic adjunct in rescue treatment, like in ischemia-reperfusion of the heart or other organs, or in acetaminophen (paracetamol)-associated liver failure, there is little or nothing speaking against the use of PledOx or other PLED compounds. However, this must be thoroughly documented in more carefully designed clinical trials.
主要研究者和赞助商(PledPharma AB/Egetis Therapeutics AB)报告了POLAR A和M这两项三期试验的令人失望的结果,这两项试验涉及在根治性(A)和姑息性(M)治疗环境中接受FOLFOX6化疗的结直肠癌患者。FOLFOX6是奥沙利铂与5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)的联合用药,与单独使用5-FU相比,具有更强的杀瘤活性,但严重受限于剂量限制性铂相关的化疗引起的周围神经病变(CIPN)。POLAR试验的目的是证明PledOx[卡锰福地吡;CaMn(DPDP)]能将持续性CIPN的发生率从40%降低到20%。然而,这一假设是基于之前PLIANT二期试验中的“探索性”数据,而该数据并未反映安慰剂患者中不良毒性的预期发生率。在POLAR A和M试验中,对PledOx疗效的评估是在接受至少六个周期FOLFOX6治疗的患者中进行的,从而能够对239例A组患者和88例M组患者的疗效进行分析。PledOx组持续性CIPN发生率并未如假设那样从40%改善到20%,即改善50%,实际结果却相反,即这种令人困扰的毒性增加了约50%。可能解释这一灾难性结果的机制表明,在接受PledOx治疗后,有统计学意义的大量患者受到严重伤害,这表明两种氧化还原活性金属阳离子,即铂(奥沙利铂)和锰(PledOx)之间存在相互作用。这是一种远非令人惊讶的因果关系,但之前研究团队和赞助商并未发现。最重要的是,最近发表的数据(参考文献1)明确表明,PLIANT研究不适合作为三期临床研究的依据。总之,POLAR和PLIANT试验表明,PledOx和相关含锰化合物不适合与含铂化合物联合治疗。对于在心脏或其他器官的缺血再灌注,或对乙酰氨基酚(扑热息痛)相关的肝衰竭等救援治疗中作为治疗辅助药物使用,几乎没有反对使用PledOx或其他PLED化合物的理由。然而,这必须在更精心设计的临床试验中得到充分记录。