Suppr超能文献

分娩及产后即刻的质量指标:一项改良德尔菲研究

Quality Indicators during Delivery and the Immediate Postpartum Period: A Modified Delphi Study.

作者信息

Guiguet-Auclair Candy, Rivière Olivier, Gerbaud Laurent, Vendittelli Françoise

机构信息

CHU Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS, Institut Pascal, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Service de Santé Publique, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;11(6):848. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060848.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our research hypothesis was that most French indicators of quality of care have been validated by experts who are not clinicians and might not always be meaningful for clinicians. Our objective was to define a core set of measurable indicators of care quality during delivery and the immediate postpartum period relevant to clinical practice.

METHODS

A steering committee comprising nine specialists in obstetrics and/or public health conducted a literature review to develop potential indicators. A panel of obstetrician-gynecologists and midwives working in a delivery unit rated each indicator for appropriateness in a two-round Rand-modified Delphi procedure and a physical meeting. The consensus among the panelists was assessed.

RESULTS

In the first round, 145 panelists (110 obstetrician-gynecologists and 35 midwives) assessed 77 indicators and 3 definitions: 6 related to labor onset, 20 to delivery, 3 to pain management, 23 to neonatal morbidity/mortality, and 28 to maternal morbidity. In the second round, 132 panelists (98 obstetrician-gynecologists and 34 midwives) assessed 42 indicators and 1 definition. The final set comprised 50 indicators and 2 definitions.

CONCLUSIONS

This Delphi procedure selected 50 indicators that reflect the quality of perinatal care. These indicators should be recorded in each French maternity ward's birth register for each delivery.

摘要

背景

我们的研究假设是,法国大多数医疗质量指标已由非临床医生的专家验证,对临床医生而言可能并不总是有意义。我们的目标是确定一套与临床实践相关的、可衡量的分娩期及产后即刻护理质量核心指标。

方法

由九名产科和/或公共卫生专家组成的指导委员会进行文献综述以制定潜在指标。在两轮兰德改良德尔菲法程序和一次面对面会议中,一组在分娩单元工作的妇产科医生和助产士对每个指标的适宜性进行评分。评估了小组成员之间的共识。

结果

在第一轮中,145名小组成员(110名妇产科医生和35名助产士)评估了77个指标和3个定义:6个与临产相关,20个与分娩相关,3个与疼痛管理相关,23个与新生儿发病率/死亡率相关,28个与孕产妇发病率相关。在第二轮中,132名小组成员(98名妇产科医生和34名助产士)评估了42个指标和1个定义。最终集合包括50个指标和2个定义。

结论

这种德尔菲法程序选出了50个反映围产期护理质量的指标。这些指标应记录在法国每个产科病房的每次分娩出生登记册中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e6d/10048479/cb0a015bfe9e/healthcare-11-00848-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验