Department of Biology, Zaporizhzhia National University, Zhukovskogo 66, 69063 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine; Institute of Parasitology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Hlinkova 3, 04001 Košice, Slovak Republic.
Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, PO Box 22 085, 46071 Valencia, Spain. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/@JA_Balbuena.
Int J Parasitol. 2023 May;53(5-6):305-316. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
Dispersal of alien species is a global problem threatening native biodiversity. Co-introduction of non-native parasites and pathogens adds to the severity of this threat, but this indirect impact has received less attention. To shed light on the key factors determining the richness of microorganisms in native and invasive host species, we compared symbiotic (parasitic and epibiotic) communities of gammarids across different habitats and localities along the Baltic coast of Poland. Seven gammarid species, two native and five invasive, were sampled from 16 freshwater and brackish localities. Sixty symbiotic species of microorganisms of nine phyla were identified. This taxonomically diverse species assemblage of symbionts allowed us to assess the effect of host translocation and regional ecological determinants driving assembly richness in the gammarid hosts. Our results revealed that (i) the current assemblages of symbionts of gammarid hosts in the Baltic region are formed by native and co-introduced species; (ii) species richness of the symbiotic community was higher in the native Gammarus pulex than in the invasive hosts, probably reflecting a process of species loss by invasive gammarids in the new area and the distinct habitat conditions occupied by G. pulex and invasive hosts; (iii) both host species and locality were key drivers shaping assembly composition of symbionts, whereas habitat condition (freshwater versus brackish) was a stronger determinant of communities than geographic distance; (iv) the dispersion patterns of the individual species richness of symbiotic communities were best described by Poisson distributions; in the case of an invasive host, the dispersion of the rich species diversity may switch to a right-skewed negative binomial distribution, suggesting a host-mediated regulation process. We believe this is the first analysis of the symbiotic species richness in native and invasive gammarid hosts in European waters based on original field data and a broad range of taxonomic groups including Microsporidia, Choanozoa, Ciliophora, Apicomplexa, Platyhelminthes, Nematoda, Nematomorha, Acanthocephala and Rotifera, to document the patterns of species composition and distribution.
外来物种的扩散是威胁本地生物多样性的全球性问题。非本地寄生虫和病原体的共同引入增加了这种威胁的严重性,但这种间接影响得到的关注较少。为了阐明决定本地和入侵宿主物种中微生物丰富度的关键因素,我们比较了沿波兰波罗的海沿岸不同栖息地和地点的大型溞共生(寄生和附生)群落。从 16 个淡水和半咸水地点采集了 7 种大型溞,其中 2 种为本地种,5 种为入侵种。鉴定出了 9 个门的 60 种微生物共生种。这种共生体的分类多样性使我们能够评估宿主转移和区域生态决定因素对大型溞宿主中组装丰富度的影响。我们的研究结果表明:(i)波罗的海地区大型溞宿主当前的共生体物种组合是由本地和共同引入的物种形成的;(ii)本地的拉氏大型溞的共生群落的物种丰富度高于入侵宿主,这可能反映了入侵大型溞在新地区的物种损失过程,以及拉氏大型溞和入侵宿主所占据的不同生境条件;(iii)宿主物种和地点是塑造共生体组装组成的关键驱动因素,而生境条件(淡水与半咸水)是比地理距离更强的群落决定因素;(iv)单个共生群落物种丰富度的扩散模式最好用泊松分布来描述;对于入侵宿主,丰富物种多样性的扩散可能会转变为右偏的负二项式分布,这表明存在宿主介导的调节过程。我们相信,这是首次基于原始野外数据和广泛的分类群(包括微孢子虫、原生动物、纤毛动物、顶复动物、扁形动物、线虫动物、线虫动物、棘头动物和轮虫动物)分析欧洲水域本地和入侵大型溞宿主的共生物种丰富度,以记录物种组成和分布模式。