Suppr超能文献

基于体素和基于表面的形态计量分析在经病理证实的颗粒状嗜银病和阿尔茨海默病患者中的应用。

Voxel-Based and Surface-Based Morphometry Analysis in Patients with Pathologically Confirmed Argyrophilic Grain Disease and Alzheimer's Disease.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan.

Choju Medical Institute, Fukushimura Hospital, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;93(1):379-387. doi: 10.3233/JAD-230068.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to clinicoradiological similarities, including amnestic cognitive impairment and limbic atrophy, differentiation of argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) from Alzheimer's disease (AD) is often challenging. Minimally invasive biomarkers, especially magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are valuable in routine clinical practice. Although it is necessary to explore radiological clues, morphometry analyses using new automated analytical methods, including whole-brain voxel-based morphometry (VBM) and surface-based morphometry (SBM), have not been sufficiently investigated in patients with pathologically confirmed AGD and AD.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the volumetric differences in VBM and SBM analyses between patients with pathologically confirmed AGD and AD.

METHODS

Eight patients with pathologically confirmed AGD with a lower Braak neurofibrillary tangle stage (<III), 11 patients with pathologically confirmed AD without comorbid AGD, and 10 healthy controls (HC) were investigated. Gray matter volumetric changes in VBM and cortical thickness changes in SBM were compared between the two patient groups (i.e., AGD and AD) and the HC group.

RESULTS

In contrast to widespread gray matter volume or cortical thickness loss in the bilateral limbic, temporoparietal, and frontal lobes of the AD group, these were limited, especially in the limbic lobes, in the AGD group, compared with that of the HC group. Although bilateral posterior dominant gray matter volume loss was identified in the AD group compared with the AGD group on VBM, there was no significant cluster between these patient groups on SBM.

CONCLUSION

VBM and SBM analyses both showed a different distribution of atrophic changes between AGD and AD.

摘要

背景

由于临床和影像学的相似性,包括健忘性认知障碍和边缘系统萎缩,因此很难将颗粒性脑动脉硬化病(AGD)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)区分开来。微创生物标志物,尤其是磁共振成像(MRI),在常规临床实践中具有重要价值。尽管有必要探索影像学线索,但使用新的自动分析方法(包括全脑基于体素的形态测量学(VBM)和基于表面的形态测量学(SBM))进行形态计量分析,尚未在经病理证实的 AGD 和 AD 患者中得到充分研究。

目的

本研究旨在确定经病理证实的 AGD 和 AD 患者 VBM 和 SBM 分析中的容积差异。

方法

共纳入 8 例经病理证实的 AGD 患者(Braak 神经纤维缠结分期较低[<III])、11 例经病理证实的无共病 AGD 的 AD 患者和 10 例健康对照者(HC)。比较两组患者(AGD 和 AD)与 HC 组之间 VBM 的灰质容积变化和 SBM 的皮质厚度变化。

结果

与 AD 组双侧边缘系统、颞顶叶和额叶的广泛灰质体积或皮质厚度丢失相比,AGD 组这些区域的改变有限,特别是在边缘系统,与 HC 组相比。尽管与 AGD 组相比,AD 组的 VBM 显示双侧后叶优势的灰质体积丢失,但 SBM 上这些患者组之间没有明显的聚类。

结论

VBM 和 SBM 分析均显示 AGD 和 AD 之间萎缩变化的分布不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验