Rishi Pukhraj, Attiku Yamini, Manchegowda Pradeep T, Agarwal Ashutosh, Sharma Minal
Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Vitreoretin Dis. 2020 Sep 21;5(2):121-129. doi: 10.1177/2474126420951980. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
This work subclassifies retinoblastoma vitreous seeds and evaluates the efficacy, regression patterns, and adverse effects of combination intravitreal melphalan and topotecan chemotherapy for resistant and recurrent vitreous seeds.
A retrospective review of medical records was conducted of patients with retinoblastoma and resistant or recurrent vitreous seeds who were treated with intravitreal melphalan and topotecan injections from August 2014 to July 2018. Main outcome measures included regression pattern, time for regression, time for recurrence of seeds, treatment outcomes, and ocular toxicity.
Nineteen eyes received 138 intravitreal injections over 74 treatment sessions (mean, 7.26 injections per eye); vitreous seeds regressed in 18 eyes. Of cloud vitreous seeds, curvilinear (n = 2) and sphero-linear (n = 2) subtypes were observed. During regression, some sphere seeds showed an intermediary streak-like pattern and took longer to regress (mean, 11.13 ± 14.05 months and 11.67 ± 8.62 injections) than those without the intermediary streak-like pattern (mean, 3.55 ± 2.57 months and 4.2 ± 1.87 injections). Mean follow-up was 34.87 ± 21.09 months (median, 35 months; range, 11-96 months). Anterior segment toxicity was seen in 10 (53%) eyes and posterior segment toxicity in 5 (26%) eyes. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for globe salvage at 2 years was 94% and 73% at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival for vitreous seed-free status was 94% at 2 years and 65% at 5 years.
An expanded vitreous seed classification system that further subcategorizes hitherto unrecognized vitreous seed morphology is needed. An intermediate streaking process results in a prolonged regression time for sphere vitreous seeds.
对视网膜母细胞瘤玻璃体种植体进行亚分类,并评估玻璃体内美法仑和拓扑替康联合化疗对耐药和复发性玻璃体种植体的疗效、消退模式及不良反应。
对2014年8月至2018年7月期间接受玻璃体内美法仑和拓扑替康注射治疗的视网膜母细胞瘤合并耐药或复发性玻璃体种植体患者的病历进行回顾性分析。主要观察指标包括消退模式、消退时间、种植体复发时间、治疗效果及眼毒性。
19只眼在74个治疗疗程中共接受了138次玻璃体内注射(平均每眼7.26次);18只眼的玻璃体种植体消退。在云雾状玻璃体种植体中,观察到曲线形(n = 2)和球-线形(n = 2)亚型。在消退过程中,一些球形种植体呈现中间条纹状模式,其消退时间(平均11.13±14.05个月,11.67±8.62次注射)比无中间条纹状模式的种植体(平均3.55±2.57个月,4.2±1.87次注射)更长。平均随访时间为34.87±21.09个月(中位数35个月;范围11 - 96个月)。10只眼(53%)出现前段毒性,5只眼(26%)出现后段毒性。2年时眼球挽救的Kaplan-Meier生存率为94%,5年时为73%。玻璃体无种植体状态的Kaplan-Meier生存率2年时为94%,5年时为65%。
需要一个扩展的玻璃体种植体分类系统,进一步对迄今未被认识的玻璃体种植体形态进行亚分类。中间条纹形成过程导致球形玻璃体种植体的消退时间延长。