Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Tyuo-Ward, Osaka City, Osaka-Prefecture, Japan.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jul;27(7):1336-1344. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05668-y. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Accurate prognostic estimation is crucial; however, the prognostic value of tumor deposits in gastric cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate their prognostic significance.
Clinicopathological and prognostic data of 1012 gastric cancer patients who underwent R0 or R1 surgery from 2010 to 2017 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute were retrospectively reviewed.
Overall, 6.3% patients had tumor deposits, which were associated with Borrmann type, surgical procedure, type of gastrectomy, extent of lymphadenectomy, tumor size, histology, pT, pN, pM, pStage, lymphatic invasion, vascular invasion, preoperative chemotherapy, and postoperative chemotherapy. Tumor deposit-positive patients had worse 5-year disease-free survival (32.60% vs. 92.45%) and overall survival (41.22% vs. 89.37%) than tumor deposit-negative patients. Subgroup analysis regarding pStage II-III also showed significant differences between patients with and without tumor deposits for 5-year disease-free survival (34.15% vs. 80.98%) and overall survival (43.17% vs. 75.78%). Multivariable analysis showed that older age, undifferentiated histology, deeper tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, and presence of tumor deposits were significantly correlated with early tumor recurrence and shorter survival time; these factors were identified as independent prognostic factors. The 5-year disease-free survival of tumor deposit-positive patients was significantly worse than that of patients in the pStage III group and comparable to that of patients in the pT4, pN3, and pM1 groups. The 5-year overall survival of tumor deposit-positive patients was comparable to that of the pT4, pN3, pM1, and pStage III groups.
Tumor deposits are strong and independent predictors of tumor recurrence and poor survival.
准确的预后评估至关重要;然而,肿瘤沉积物在胃癌中的预后价值仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨其预后意义。
回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2017 年在大阪国际癌症研究所接受 RO 或 R1 手术的 1012 例胃癌患者的临床病理和预后数据。
总体而言,6.3%的患者有肿瘤沉积物,与 Borrmann 类型、手术方式、胃切除术类型、淋巴结清扫程度、肿瘤大小、组织学、pT、pN、pM、p 分期、淋巴血管侵犯、术前化疗和术后化疗有关。肿瘤沉积物阳性患者的 5 年无病生存率(32.60% vs. 92.45%)和总生存率(41.22% vs. 89.37%)明显低于肿瘤沉积物阴性患者。pStage II-III 亚组分析也显示了有肿瘤沉积物和无肿瘤沉积物患者 5 年无病生存率(34.15% vs. 80.98%)和总生存率(43.17% vs. 75.78%)之间的显著差异。多变量分析显示,年龄较大、未分化组织学、肿瘤浸润较深、淋巴结转移、远处转移和肿瘤沉积物的存在与早期肿瘤复发和生存时间缩短显著相关;这些因素被确定为独立的预后因素。肿瘤沉积物阳性患者的 5 年无病生存率明显差于 pStage III 组患者,与 pT4、pN3 和 pM1 组患者相当。肿瘤沉积物阳性患者的 5 年总生存率与 pT4、pN3、pM1 和 pStage III 组相当。
肿瘤沉积物是肿瘤复发和不良生存的强有力且独立的预测因子。