Laboratory of Physical Activity and Health, Center of Physical Education and Sports, Londrina State University - UEL, Highway Celso Garcia Cid, Km 380, University Campus, P.O. box 6001, 86051-990, Londrina, Paraná, Brazil.
Department of Humanities, Federal Technological University of Paraná - UTFPR, Apucarana, Paraná, Brazil.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 4;23(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15545-7.
This study was aimed to examine the relationship between muscular fitness indicators in childhood and areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in adulthood and to verify whether the relationship is mediated by performance on muscular fitness indicators in adulthood.
A sample of 138 healthy adults (69 males; 22.3 years) were followed after a previous assessment at the age of 7-10 years. Stature, body mass and muscular fitness indicators (handgrip strength, standing long jump and sit-ups tests) were assessed in childhood and adulthood. Additionally, total body, upper limbs, lower limbs, right femoral neck and lumbar spine aBMD was assessed in adulthood using dual X-ray absorptiometry. Analysis included descriptive statistics; t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test for comparison between males and females, multiple linear regression for the prediction aBMD from muscular fitness indicators in childhood, mediation analysis of the respective muscular fitness indicators in adulthood and the relationship between muscular fitness indicators in childhood and aBMD.
Males were stronger compared to females regarding muscular fitness indicators in childhood and adulthood, and presented higher mean values for aBMD in adulthood, except for lumbar spine (p < 0.05). Regression analysis revealed that some muscular fitness indicators in childhood showed significant positive relationship with bone health indicators in adulthood, such as: handgrip strength and total body aBMD (β = 0.005; R = 0.35; p = 0.040) and upper limbs aBMD (β = 0.005; R = 0.55; p = 0.019); and sit-ups test was a significant predictors of lumbar spine BMD (β = 0.003; R = 0.06; p = 0.039). Mediation analysis pointed out the following: adulthood handgrip strength mediated relationships between childhood handgrip strength and total aBMD (indirect effect (IE) = 0.0025; 95%CI = 0.0005-0.0048), and upper limbs aBMD (IE = 0.0040; 95%CI = 0.0017-0.0069).
Muscular fitness indicators in childhood showed significant relationship with bone health indicators in adulthood and the sit-ups test in childhood had direct effect on lumbar spine aBMD in adulthood. Adulthood handgrip strength mediated the relationship between childhood handgrip strength and total body and upper limb aBMD, pointing out that muscular fitness in childhood may be a aBMD determinant in adulthood, especially when higher muscle fitness performance is maintained in adulthood.
本研究旨在探讨儿童时期肌肉力量指标与成年后骨密度(aBMD)之间的关系,并验证这种关系是否通过成年后肌肉力量指标的表现来介导。
对 138 名健康成年人(69 名男性;22.3 岁)进行了随访,这些人在 7-10 岁时曾接受过评估。在儿童期和成年期评估了身高、体重和肌肉力量指标(握力、立定跳远和仰卧起坐测试)。此外,使用双能 X 线吸收法在成年期评估了全身、上肢、下肢、右侧股骨颈和腰椎的 aBMD。分析包括描述性统计;t 检验或 Mann-Whitney U 检验用于比较男性和女性,多元线性回归用于预测儿童时期肌肉力量指标对成年时期 aBMD 的影响,分析成年时期各肌肉力量指标的中介作用以及儿童时期肌肉力量指标与 aBMD 之间的关系。
男性在儿童期和成年期的肌肉力量指标均强于女性,且除腰椎外,在成年期的 aBMD 平均值均较高(p<0.05)。回归分析显示,儿童时期的一些肌肉力量指标与成年时期的骨健康指标呈显著正相关,例如:握力与全身 aBMD(β=0.005;R=0.35;p=0.040)和上肢 aBMD(β=0.005;R=0.55;p=0.019);仰卧起坐测试是腰椎 BMD 的显著预测指标(β=0.003;R=0.06;p=0.039)。中介分析指出以下几点:成年握力中介了儿童握力与全身总 aBMD(间接效应(IE)=0.0025;95%CI=0.0005-0.0048)和上肢 aBMD(IE=0.0040;95%CI=0.0017-0.0069)之间的关系。
儿童时期的肌肉力量指标与成年时期的骨健康指标呈显著相关,儿童时期的仰卧起坐测试对成年时期的腰椎 aBMD 有直接影响。成年握力中介了儿童握力与全身和上肢 aBMD 的关系,这表明儿童时期的肌肉力量可能是成年时期 aBMD 的决定因素,尤其是在成年时期保持较高的肌肉力量表现时。