• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公共资助的药品计划对儿童和青少年处方兴奋剂使用的影响:基于人群的观察性自然实验。

Impact of a Publicly-Funded Pharmacare Program on Prescription Stimulant use Among Children and Youth: A Population-Based Observational Natural Experiment.

机构信息

Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;68(11):826-837. doi: 10.1177/07067437231166836. Epub 2023 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1177/07067437231166836
PMID:37016841
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10590092/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Stimulants are first-line pharmacotherapy for individuals with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. However, disparities in drug coverage may contribute to inequitable treatment access. In January 2018, the government of Ontario, Canada, implemented a publicly-funded program (OHIP+) providing universal access to medications at no cost to children and youth between the ages of 0 and 24. In April 2019, the program was amended to cover only children and youth without private insurance. We studied whether these policy changes were associated with changes in prescription stimulant dispensing to Ontario children and youth.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based observational natural experiment study of stimulant dispensing to children and youth in Ontario between January 2013 and March 2020. We used interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models to estimate the association between OHIP+ and its subsequent modification with stimulant dispensing trends.

RESULTS

The implementation of OHIP+ was associated with a significant immediate increase in the monthly rate of stimulant dispensing of 53.6 individuals per 100,000 population (95% confidence interval [CI], 36.8 to 70.5 per 100,000) and a 14.2% (95% CI, 12.8% to 15.6%) relative percent increase in stimulant dispensing rates between December 2017 and March 2019 (1198.6 vs. 1368.7 per 100,000 population). The April 2019 OHIP+ program amendment was associated with an increase in monthly stimulant dispensing trends of 10.2 individuals per 100,000 population (95% CI, 5.0 to 15.5), with rates increasing 7.5% (95% CI, 6.2% to 8.7%) between March 2019 and March 2020 (1368.7 vs. 1470.8 per 100,000 population). These associations were most pronounced among males, children and youth living in the highest income neighbourhoods and individuals aged 20 to 24.

CONCLUSION

A publicly-funded pharmacare program was associated with more children and youth being dispensed stimulants.

摘要

目的

兴奋剂是治疗注意力缺陷多动障碍患者的一线药物疗法。然而,药物覆盖范围的差异可能导致治疗机会不平等。2018 年 1 月,加拿大安大略省政府实施了一项公共资助计划(OHIP+),为 0 至 24 岁的儿童和青少年提供免费的药物治疗。2019 年 4 月,该计划修订为仅涵盖没有私人保险的儿童和青少年。我们研究了这些政策变化是否与安大略省儿童和青少年处方兴奋剂的发放变化有关。

方法

我们对安大略省儿童和青少年 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 3 月期间的兴奋剂发放情况进行了基于人群的观察性自然实验研究。我们使用干预自回归综合移动平均模型来估计 OHIP+及其随后对兴奋剂发放趋势的修改与兴奋剂发放趋势之间的关联。

结果

OHIP+的实施与每月兴奋剂发放率显著增加有关,每 10 万人中有 53.6 人(95%置信区间[CI],36.8 至 70.5/10 万),2017 年 12 月至 2019 年 3 月期间,兴奋剂发放率相对百分比增加 14.2%(95%CI,12.8%至 15.6%)(每 10 万人 1198.6 至 1368.7)。2019 年 4 月 OHIP+计划修正案与每月兴奋剂发放趋势增加 10.2 人/10 万有关(95%CI,5.0 至 15.5),2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 3 月期间,发放率增加 7.5%(95%CI,6.2%至 8.7%)(每 10 万人 1368.7 至 1470.8)。这些关联在男性、居住在收入最高社区的儿童和青少年以及 20 至 24 岁的个体中最为明显。

结论

一项公共资助的药物保险计划与更多的儿童和青少年获得兴奋剂治疗有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/10590092/e49803e942f1/10.1177_07067437231166836-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/10590092/e49803e942f1/10.1177_07067437231166836-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1554/10590092/e49803e942f1/10.1177_07067437231166836-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of a Publicly-Funded Pharmacare Program on Prescription Stimulant use Among Children and Youth: A Population-Based Observational Natural Experiment.公共资助的药品计划对儿童和青少年处方兴奋剂使用的影响:基于人群的观察性自然实验。
Can J Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;68(11):826-837. doi: 10.1177/07067437231166836. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
2
Impact of a publicly-funded pharmacare program policy on benzodiazepine dispensing among children and youth: a population-based natural experiment.一项公共资助的药物福利计划政策对儿童和青少年苯二氮䓬类药物配药的影响:一项基于人群的自然实验。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04331-4.
3
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on prescription stimulant use among children and youth: a population-based study.新冠疫情对儿童和青少年处方兴奋剂使用的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;33(8):2669-2680. doi: 10.1007/s00787-023-02346-x. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
4
Trends in stimulant dispensing by age, sex, state of residence, and prescriber specialty - United States, 2014-2019.2014-2019 年美国按年龄、性别、居住州和开处方医生专业划分的兴奋剂配药趋势。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108297. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108297. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
The impact of OHIP+ pharmacare on use and costs of public drug plans among children and youth in Ontario: a time-series analysis.安大略省 OHIP+ 药品福利计划对儿童和青少年公共药品计划使用和成本的影响:时间序列分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Sep 27;10(3):E848-E855. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210295. Print 2022 Sep-Oct.
6
Geographic variation and sociodemographic correlates of prescription psychotropic drug use among children and youth in Ontario, Canada: a population-based study.加拿大安大略省儿童和青少年处方精神药物使用的地域差异和社会人口学相关性:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 11;23(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14677-6.
7
ADHD Treatment in Primary Care: Demographic Factors, Medication Trends, and Treatment Predictors.基层医疗中的注意力缺陷多动障碍治疗:人口统计学因素、用药趋势及治疗预测因素
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Jun;62(6):393-402. doi: 10.1177/0706743716689055. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
8
Patterns of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medicine use in the era of new non-stimulant medicines: A population-based study among Australian children and adults (2013-2020).新型非兴奋剂类药物时代注意缺陷多动障碍药物使用模式:澳大利亚儿童和成人的基于人群研究(2013-2020 年)。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2023 May;57(5):675-685. doi: 10.1177/00048674221114782. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
9
Introduction of publicly funded pharmacare and socioeconomic disparities in glycemic management in children and youth with type 1 diabetes in Ontario, Canada: a population-based trend analysis.加拿大安大略省全民医保覆盖对 1 型糖尿病患儿血糖管理的影响及其与社会经济差异的关系:基于人群的趋势分析。
CMAJ Open. 2022 Jun 14;10(2):E519-E526. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20210214. Print 2022 Apr-Jun.
10
Stimulant and non-stimulant attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder drug use: total population study of trends and discontinuation patterns 2006-2009.兴奋剂和非兴奋剂注意缺陷/多动障碍药物使用:2006-2009 年总体人群趋势和停药模式研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013 Jul;128(1):70-7. doi: 10.1111/acps.12004. Epub 2012 Sep 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Universal Pharmacare and Contraceptive Dispensations Among Youth.青少年中的全民医保与避孕药具发放
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2585.

本文引用的文献

1
TikTok and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study of Social Media Content Quality.TikTok 与注意力缺陷多动障碍:社交媒体内容质量的横断面研究。
Can J Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;67(12):899-906. doi: 10.1177/07067437221082854. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Diagnostic and Medication Treatment Disparities in African American Children with ADHD: a Literature Review.非裔美国儿童注意缺陷多动障碍的诊断和药物治疗差异:文献综述。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Oct;9(5):2027-2048. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01142-0. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
3
Evidence-based pharmacological treatment options for ADHD in children and adolescents.
儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍的循证药理学治疗选择。
Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Feb;230:107940. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107940. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
4
Interrupted time series analysis using autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models: a guide for evaluating large-scale health interventions.使用自回归求和移动平均 (ARIMA) 模型的中断时间序列分析:评估大规模卫生干预措施的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 22;21(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01235-8.
5
Trends in stimulant dispensing by age, sex, state of residence, and prescriber specialty - United States, 2014-2019.2014-2019 年美国按年龄、性别、居住州和开处方医生专业划分的兴奋剂配药趋势。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Dec 1;217:108297. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108297. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
6
Improving Pediatrician's Behavioral Health Competencies Through the Project ECHO Teleconsultation Model.通过 ECHO 远程咨询模式提高儿科医生的行为健康能力。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2020 Oct;59(12):1049-1057. doi: 10.1177/0009922820927018. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
7
Universal Pharmacare in Canada: A Prescription for Equity in Healthcare.加拿大全民医保:医疗保健公平的一剂良药。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Mar 1;9(3):91-95. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2019.93.
8
Gender Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of ADHD Among Clinic-Referred Children.门诊转诊儿童注意缺陷多动障碍客观与主观测量中的性别差异
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Dec 13;13:441. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00441. eCollection 2019.
9
Systematic Review: Nonmedical Use of Prescription Stimulants: Risk Factors, Outcomes, and Risk Reduction Strategies.系统评价:处方兴奋剂的非医疗使用:风险因素、后果和风险降低策略。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):100-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.012. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
10
Prescription prevalence of psychotropic drugs in children and adolescents: an analysis of international data.儿童和青少年精神药物的处方流行率:国际数据分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;75(10):1333-1346. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02711-3. Epub 2019 Jul 4.