Gautam N, Dhungana R, Gyawali S, Dhakal S, Pradhan P Ms
Maharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2022 Apr-Jun;20(78):219-224.
Background The present Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS) curriculum under Tribhuvan University - Institute of Medicine (TU-IOM) was last revised twelve-years back. Though the curriculum was built upon internationally approved recommendations on curriculum design, it is ineffectively practiced in most medical schools of Nepal with major focus on didactic teaching-learning. The curriculum, hence, needs effective implementation and revision. Objective To identify the strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement in the medical curriculum through student-based feedback and outline the possibility of incorporating newer evidence-based teaching-learning methodologies in Nepal. Method This is a descriptive and cross-sectional study. With appropriate ethical approval, a questionnaire was developed and disseminated virtually to all medical students of Nepal under TU from MBBS fourth year onwards. The questionnaire comprised of Likert and close-ended questions. The data analysis was followed after receiving the filled questionnaire through Google forms. Result A total of 337 respondents participated in the study. The most effectively implemented components out of the SPICES model were Integrated learning (I) and Communitybased learning (C), with 73.89% and 68.84% responses. There were 94.7% (319) students who favored the incorporation of research in the core curriculum. Only 34.2% (115) students found PowerPoint lectures, the most utilized form of teachinglearning in Nepal, as engaging. The respondents (84.6%) showed a high degree of readiness to incorporate newer evidence-based teaching-learning tools such as flipped learning, blended learning, and peer-to-peer learning. Conclusion This study shows that effective interventions must be rethought on various aspects of the curriculum, taking students' feedback on the table while considering curricular revision.
背景 加德满都大学医学院(TU - IOM)现行的医学学士和外科学士(MBBS)课程体系上次修订是在十二年前。尽管该课程体系是基于国际认可的课程设计建议构建的,但在尼泊尔的大多数医学院校中,其实施效果不佳,主要侧重于理论教学。因此,该课程体系需要有效实施和修订。目的 通过基于学生的反馈确定医学课程体系的优势、劣势和改进领域,并概述在尼泊尔纳入更新的循证教学方法的可能性。方法 这是一项描述性横断面研究。在获得适当的伦理批准后,设计了一份问卷,并通过网络向加德满都大学从MBBS四年级起的所有医学生发放。问卷包括李克特量表和封闭式问题。通过谷歌表格收到填写好的问卷后进行数据分析。结果 共有337名受访者参与了该研究。SPICES模型中实施最有效的部分是整合学习(I)和基于社区的学习(C),分别有73.89%和68.84%的反馈。94.7%(319名)学生赞成在核心课程中纳入研究内容。只有34.2%(115名)学生认为尼泊尔最常用的教学形式——PowerPoint讲座具有吸引力。受访者(84.6%)表示非常愿意纳入更新的循证教学工具,如翻转课堂、混合式学习和同伴互助学习。结论 本研究表明,在考虑课程修订时,必须根据学生对课程各方面的反馈,重新思考有效的干预措施。