Parchure D S, Mishra G V, Kulkarni S S
PhD, ICMR-PDF, Department of Trans-fusion Medicine, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, India.
PhD, Department of Transfusion Medicine, ICMR-National Institute of Immunohaematology, Mumbai, India.
Immunohematology. 2023 Apr 5;39(1):19-31. doi: 10.21307/immunohematology-2023-005. Print 2023 Apr 1.
Complexities of D within the Rh blood group system have long been recognized, initially using basic serologic testing and, more recently, using advanced and sensitive typing reagents. Discrepancies may arise when an individual carries a D antigen showing altered D antigen expression. These D variants are clinically important, since they may lead to production of anti-D in the carrier and induce alloimmunization in D- recipients, making their correct identification imperative. For clinical purposes, D variants can be classified into three groups: weak D, partial D, and DEL. The problem surrounding proper characterization of D variants exists because routine serologic tests are sometimes inadequate to detect D variants or resolve discrepant or ambiguous D typing results. Today, molecular analysis has revealed more than 300 alleles and is a better method for investigating D variants. Global distribution of variants differs, as observed in European, African, and East Asian populations. Discovery of the novel (weak D type 150) with a nucleotide change of c.327_487-4164dup is proof. This variant, the result of an insertion of a duplicated exon 3 between exons 2 and 4 in the same orientation, was detected in more than 50 percent of Indian D variant samples in a 2018 study. The outcome of studies worldwide has led to the recommendation to manage D variant individuals as D+ or D- according to genotype. The policies and workup with respect to D variant testing in donors, recipients, and prenatal women differ among blood banks, depending on type of variants predominantly encountered. Thus, a general genotyping protocol cannot be followed globally, and an Indian-specific genotyping assay (multiplex polymerase chain reaction) designed to detect D variants frequently found in the Indian population was developed to save time and resources. This assay is also helpful for detecting several partial and null alleles. Identification of D variants by serology and characterization by molecular testing need to go hand-in-hand for better and safer transfusion practices.
长期以来,人们一直认识到Rh血型系统中D抗原的复杂性,最初是使用基本的血清学检测方法,最近则使用先进且灵敏的分型试剂。当个体携带D抗原表达发生改变的D抗原时,可能会出现差异。这些D变异体具有临床重要性,因为它们可能导致携带者产生抗-D,并在D阴性受者中诱导同种免疫,因此正确识别它们至关重要。出于临床目的,D变异体可分为三组:弱D、部分D和DEL。围绕D变异体正确表征的问题之所以存在,是因为常规血清学检测有时不足以检测D变异体或解决不一致或模糊的D分型结果。如今,分子分析已揭示出300多个等位基因,是研究D变异体的更好方法。正如在欧洲、非洲和东亚人群中观察到的那样,变异体的全球分布有所不同。发现具有c.327_487-4164dup核苷酸变化的新型(弱D型150)就是证明。在2018年的一项研究中,这种变异体是由于在第2外显子和第4外显子之间以相同方向插入了一个重复的第3外显子而产生的,在超过50%的印度D变异体样本中被检测到。全球范围内的研究结果导致建议根据基因型将D变异体个体按D阳性或D阴性进行管理。不同血库对于供者、受者和孕妇D变异体检测的政策和检查方法各不相同,这取决于主要遇到的变异体类型。因此,无法在全球范围内遵循通用的基因分型方案,为了节省时间和资源,开发了一种印度特异性的基因分型检测方法(多重聚合酶链反应),用于检测印度人群中常见的D变异体。该检测方法对于检测几种部分和无效等位基因也很有帮助。为了实现更好、更安全的输血实践,通过血清学鉴定D变异体和通过分子检测进行表征需要携手并进。