Tertiary Emergency Medical Center, Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida-ku, Japan
Tertiary Emergency Medical Center, Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida-ku, Japan.
Emerg Med J. 2023 Jun;40(6):418-423. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212757. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Whether and how bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) modifies the cardiac rhythm after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) over time remains unclear. We investigated the association between bystander CPR and the likelihood of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) as the first documented cardiac rhythm.
We identified individuals with witnessed OHCA of cardiac origin from a nationwide population-based OHCA registry in Japan between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2019. The first documented cardiac rhythm was compared between patients who received bystander CPR and those who did not, using a 1:2 propensity score-matched analysis.
Of 309 900 patients with witnessed OHCA of cardiac origin, 71 887 (23.2%) received bystander CPR. Propensity score matching paired 71 882 patients who received bystander CPR with 143 764 who did not. The likelihood of detecting a VF/VT rhythm was significantly higher among patients who received bystander CPR than among those who did not (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.63 to 1.69; p<0.001). Comparing the two groups at each time point, the difference in the proportions of patients with VF/VT rhythms peaked at 15-20 min but was insignificant at 30 min postcollapse (15 min after collapse; 20.9% vs 13.9%; p<0.001). The likelihood of a pulseless electrical activity rhythm was significantly lower in patients who received bystander CPR during the first 25 min postcollapse (15 min after collapse; 26.2% vs 31.5%; p<0.001). The two groups had no significant difference in the likelihood of asystole (15 min after collapse; 51.0% vs 53.3%; p=0.078).
Bystander CPR was associated with a higher VF/VT likelihood and a lower likelihood of pulseless electrical activity at first documented rhythm analysis. Our results support early CPR for OHCA and highlight the need for further research to understand whether and how CPR modifies the cardiac rhythm after arrest.
院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)是否以及如何随时间改变心脏节律尚不清楚。我们研究了旁观者 CPR 与首次记录的心律失常为室颤(VF)或室性心动过速(VT)的可能性之间的关系。
我们从日本全国性 OHCA 注册中心确定了 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间有目击者的心脏来源 OHCA 个体。使用 1:2 倾向评分匹配分析比较接受旁观者 CPR 和未接受旁观者 CPR 的患者的首次记录的心脏节律。
在 309900 名有目击者的心脏来源 OHCA 患者中,71887 名(23.2%)接受了旁观者 CPR。倾向评分匹配将 71882 名接受旁观者 CPR 的患者与 143764 名未接受旁观者 CPR 的患者配对。与未接受旁观者 CPR 的患者相比,接受旁观者 CPR 的患者检测到 VF/VT 节律的可能性明显更高(OR 1.66;95%CI 1.63 至 1.69;p<0.001)。在每个时间点比较两组,VF/VT 节律患者比例的差异在 15-20 分钟时达到峰值,但在 30 分钟时不显著(崩溃后 15 分钟;20.9% 对 13.9%;p<0.001)。在崩溃后前 25 分钟内接受旁观者 CPR 的患者中,无脉电活动节律的可能性明显较低(崩溃后 15 分钟;26.2% 对 31.5%;p<0.001)。两组在停搏的可能性方面没有显著差异(崩溃后 15 分钟;51.0% 对 53.3%;p=0.078)。
旁观者 CPR 与 VF/VT 可能性增加和首次记录的节律分析中无脉电活动的可能性降低相关。我们的结果支持 OHCA 的早期 CPR,并强调需要进一步研究以了解 CPR 是否以及如何改变心脏骤停后的节律。