Suppr超能文献

单开门自锁式融合器与颈椎前路钢板在三节段颈椎前路减压融合术中的临床和影像学效果:一项回顾性对比研究。

Clinical and imaging outcomes of self-locking stand-alone cages and anterior cage-with-plate in three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective comparative study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Tongren Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1111 XianXia Road, Shanghai, 200336, China.

Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 100 Haining Road, Shanghai, 200080, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Apr 5;18(1):276. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03726-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion has been considered standard management for cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy. However, the option of using self-locking stand-alone cages or cage-with-plate in three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion still remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging outcomes of the two procedures in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients who underwent three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion were enrolled in this study, of which 31 patients underwent surgery using self-locking stand-alone cages (group cage) and 36 patients using cage-with-plate (group plate). For the evaluation of clinical outcomes, modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, visual analogue scale for neck pain, neck disability index, Odom's criteria and dysphagia status were measured. Imaging outcomes were evaluated by cervical sagittal angle, fusion segmental Cobb's angle, fusion segmental height, range of motion, cage subsidence rate, fusion rate and adjacent segment degeneration. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software (version 19.0).

RESULTS

Both groups showed improvement in modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, visual analogue scale for neck pain and neck disability index, after surgery, and there was no significant difference between the groups. The occurrence rate of dysphagia is significantly lower in the group cage compared with the group plate (p < 0.05). The postoperative cervical sagittal angle, fusion segmental Cobb's angle, fusion segmental height and cage subsidence rate in the group plate were significantly superior to that in the group cage (p < 0.05). However, the rate of adjacent segment degeneration was significantly lower in the group cage compared with the group plate (p < 0.05). Both groups showed no significant difference in terms of fusion rate (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The self-locking stand-alone cages are effective, reliable and safe in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and radiculopathy. Self-locking stand-alone cages showed a significantly lower rate of dysphagia and adjacent segment degeneration, while anterior cervical cage-with-plate could provide stronger postoperative stability and maintain better cervical spine alignment.

摘要

背景

颈椎前路减压融合术已被认为是治疗颈椎病和神经根病的标准方法。然而,在三节段颈椎前路减压融合术中使用自锁式独立 cage 或 cage-with-plate 的选择仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估两种方法在三节段颈椎前路减压融合术中的临床和影像学结果。

方法

本研究纳入了 67 例接受三节段颈椎前路减压融合术的患者,其中 31 例采用自锁式独立 cage(cage 组),36 例采用 cage-with-plate(plate 组)。为评估临床结果,采用改良日本骨科协会评分、颈部疼痛视觉模拟评分、颈部残疾指数、Odom 标准和吞咽困难状况进行评估。影像学结果通过颈椎矢状角、融合节段 Cobb 角、融合节段高度、活动度、cage 下沉率、融合率和相邻节段退变进行评估。采用 SPSS 软件(版本 19.0)进行统计分析。

结果

两组改良日本骨科协会评分、颈部疼痛视觉模拟评分和颈部残疾指数均较术前改善,组间差异无统计学意义。cage 组吞咽困难发生率明显低于 plate 组(p<0.05)。plate 组术后颈椎矢状角、融合节段 Cobb 角、融合节段高度和 cage 下沉率明显优于 cage 组(p<0.05)。然而,cage 组相邻节段退变的发生率明显低于 plate 组(p<0.05)。两组融合率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。

结论

自锁式独立 cage 在颈椎前路减压融合术治疗颈椎病和神经根病中是有效、可靠和安全的。自锁式独立 cage 吞咽困难和相邻节段退变发生率较低,而颈椎前路 cage-with-plate 术后稳定性更强,能更好地维持颈椎曲度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验