Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Department of Otolaryngology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun 1;149(6):512-520. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0161.
Evidence is lacking from randomized clinical trials of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of targeted hypoglossal nerve stimulation (THN) of the proximal hypoglossal nerve in patients with OSA.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial (THN3) was conducted at 20 centers and included 138 patients with moderate to severe OSA with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) of 20 to 65 events per hour and body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 35 or less. The trial was conducted from May 2015 through June 2018. Data were analyzed from January 2022 through January 2023.
Implant with THN system; randomized 2:1 to activation at month 1 (treatment) or month 4 (control). All received 11 months of THN with follow-up at months 12 and 15, respectively.
Primary effectiveness end points comprised AHI and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) responder rates (RRs). Treatment responses at months 4 and 12/15 were defined as a 50% or greater reduction in AHI to 20 or less per hour and an ODI decrease of 25% or greater. Coprimary end points comprised (1) month 4 AHI and ODI RR in the treatment greater than the control group and (2) month 12/15 AHI and ODI RR in the entire cohort exceeding 50%. Secondary end points included sleep apnea severity (AHI and ODI) and patient-reported outcomes (Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and EQ-5D visual analog scale).
Among 138 participants, the mean (SD) age was 56 (9) years, and 19 (13.8%) were women. Month 4 THN RRs were substantially greater in those in the treatment vs control group (AHI, 52.3% vs 19.6%; ODI, 62.5% vs 41.3%, respectively) with treatment-control standardized mean differences of 0.725 (95% CI, 0.360-1.163) and 0.434 (95% CI, 0.070-0.843) for AHI and ODI RRs, respectively. Months 12/15 RRs were 42.5% and 60.4% for AHI and ODI, respectively. Improvements in AHI, ODI, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and EQ-5D visual analog scale scores were all clinically meaningful (medium to large effect size). Two serious adverse events and 100 nonserious related adverse events were observed from the implant procedure or study protocol.
This randomized clinical trial found that THN demonstrated improvements in sleep apnea, sleepiness, and quality of life in patients with OSAs over an extended AHI and body mass index range without prior knowledge of pharyngeal collapse pattern. Clinically meaningful improvements in AHI and patient-reported responses compared favorably with those of distal hypoglossal nerve stimulation trials, although clinically meaningful differences were not definitive for ODI.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02263859.
舌下神经刺激治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的随机临床试验证据不足。
评估靶向性舌下神经刺激(THN)近端舌下神经在 OSA 患者中的安全性和有效性。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在 20 个中心进行的随机临床试验(THN3),纳入了 138 名中重度 OSA 患者,呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)为每小时 20 至 65 次,体重指数(BMI,计算为体重除以身高的平方)为 35 或以下。试验于 2015 年 5 月至 2018 年 6 月进行。数据分析于 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月进行。
植入 THN 系统;随机分为 2:1 组,第 1 个月(治疗)或第 4 个月(对照)开始激活。所有患者均接受 11 个月的 THN 治疗,并分别在第 12 个月和第 15 个月进行随访。
主要有效性终点包括 AHI 和氧减指数(ODI)应答率(RR)。第 4 个月和第 12/15 个月的治疗反应定义为 AHI 降低 50%以上,降至每小时 20 次以下,ODI 降低 25%以上。主要次要终点包括(1)治疗组第 4 个月 AHI 和 ODI RR 大于对照组,(2)整个队列第 12/15 个月 AHI 和 ODI RR 超过 50%。次要终点包括睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度(AHI 和 ODI)和患者报告的结果(Epworth 睡眠量表、睡眠功能结果问卷和 EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表)。
在 138 名参与者中,平均(SD)年龄为 56(9)岁,19 名(13.8%)为女性。第 4 个月 THN RR 在治疗组明显大于对照组(AHI,52.3%比 19.6%;ODI,62.5%比 41.3%),治疗与对照组之间的标准化均数差值分别为 0.725(95%置信区间,0.360-1.163)和 0.434(95%置信区间,0.070-0.843)。第 12/15 个月的 RR 分别为 AHI 和 ODI 的 42.5%和 60.4%。AHI、ODI、Epworth 睡眠量表、睡眠功能结果问卷和 EQ-5D 视觉模拟量表评分的改善均具有临床意义(中到大效应量)。从植入手术或研究方案中观察到 2 例严重不良事件和 100 例非严重相关不良事件。
这项随机临床试验发现,THN 在延长的 AHI 和 BMI 范围内改善了 OSA 患者的睡眠呼吸暂停、嗜睡和生活质量,而无需预先了解咽塌陷模式。与远端舌下神经刺激试验相比,AHI 和患者报告的反应均有明显改善,尽管 ODI 的临床意义差异不明确。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02263859。