文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比纳武利尤单抗单药治疗头颈部复发或转移性鳞状细胞癌的疗效和安全性:Ⅱ期 CheckMate 714 随机临床试验。

Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab Alone for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Phase 2 CheckMate 714 Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Royal Marsden Hospital/The Institute of Cancer Research National Institute for Health and Care Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.

UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Oncol. 2023 Jun 1;9(6):779-789. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0147.


DOI:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0147
PMID:37022706
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10080406/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There remains an unmet need to improve clinical outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate clinical benefit of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in patients with R/M SCCHN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The CheckMate 714, double-blind, phase 2 randomized clinical trial was conducted at 83 sites in 21 countries between October 20, 2016, and January 23, 2019. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older and had platinum-refractory or platinum-eligible R/M SCCHN and no prior systemic therapy for R/M disease. Data were analyzed from October 20, 2016 (first patient, first visit), to March 8, 2019 (primary database lock), and April 6, 2020 (overall survival database lock). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg IV every 6 weeks) or nivolumab (3 mg/kg IV every 2 weeks) plus placebo for up to 2 years or until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or consent withdrawal. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response between treatment arms by blinded independent central review in the population with platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Exploratory end points included safety. RESULTS: Of 425 included patients, 241 (56.7%; median age, 59 [range, 24-82] years; 194 males [80.5%]) had platinum-refractory disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 159; nivolumab, n = 82) and 184 (43.3%; median age, 62 [range, 33-88] years; 152 males [82.6%]) had platinum-eligible disease (nivolumab plus ipilimumab, n = 123; nivolumab, n = 61). At primary database lock, the ORR in the population with platinum-refractory disease was 13.2% (95% CI, 8.4%-19.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 18.3% (95% CI, 10.6%-28.4%) with nivolumab (odds ratio [OR], 0.68; 95.5% CI, 0.33-1.43; P = .29). Median duration of response for nivolumab plus ipilimumab was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 11.0 months to NR) vs 11.1 months (95% CI, 4.1 months to NR) for nivolumab. In the population with platinum-eligible disease, the ORR was 20.3% (95% CI, 13.6%-28.5%) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs 29.5% (95% CI, 18.5%-42.6%) with nivolumab. The rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events with nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab were 15.8% (25 of 158) vs 14.6% (12 of 82) in the population with platinum-refractory disease and 24.6% (30 of 122) vs 13.1% (8 of 61) in the population with platinum-eligible disease. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CheckMate 714 randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point of ORR benefit with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs nivolumab alone in platinum-refractory R/M SCCHN. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab was associated with an acceptable safety profile. Research to identify patient subpopulations in R/M SCCHN that would benefit from nivolumab plus ipilimumab over nivolumab monotherapy is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02823574.

摘要

重要性:在复发性或转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(R/M SCCHN)患者中,仍需要改善临床结局。

目的:评估一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与纳武利尤单抗单药治疗 R/M SCCHN 患者的临床获益。

设计、地点和参与者:这项名为 CheckMate 714 的双盲、2 期随机临床试验于 2016 年 10 月 20 日至 2019 年 1 月 23 日在 21 个国家的 83 个地点进行。合格的参与者年龄在 18 岁或以上,患有铂类难治性或铂类适用的 R/M SCCHN,且无 R/M 疾病的先前系统治疗。数据于 2016 年 10 月 20 日(首位患者首次就诊)进行分析,至 2019 年 3 月 8 日(主要数据库锁定)和 2020 年 4 月 6 日(总生存数据库锁定)。

干预措施:患者以 2:1 的比例随机分配,接受纳武利尤单抗(3 mg/kg 静脉注射[IV]每 2 周一次)联合伊匹单抗(1 mg/kg IV 每 6 周一次)或纳武利尤单抗(3 mg/kg IV 每 2 周一次)联合安慰剂,最多治疗 2 年或直至疾病进展、不可接受的毒性作用或同意退出。

主要终点和测量指标:主要终点是铂类难治性 R/M SCCHN 患者中通过盲法独立中心评估的治疗臂之间的客观缓解率(ORR)和缓解持续时间。探索性终点包括安全性。

结果:在纳入的 425 名患者中,241 名(56.7%;中位年龄为 59 [范围,24-82] 岁;194 名男性[80.5%])患有铂类难治性疾病(纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗,n=159;纳武利尤单抗,n=82),184 名(43.3%;中位年龄为 62 [范围,33-88] 岁;152 名男性[82.6%])患有铂类适用疾病(纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗,n=123;纳武利尤单抗,n=61)。在主要数据库锁定时,铂类难治性疾病患者中纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗的 ORR 为 13.2%(95%CI,8.4%-19.5%),纳武利尤单抗的 ORR 为 18.3%(95%CI,10.6%-28.4%)(比值比[OR],0.68;95.5%CI,0.33-1.43;P=0.29)。纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗的中位缓解持续时间未达到(NR)(95%CI,11.0 个月至 NR),纳武利尤单抗的中位缓解持续时间为 11.1 个月(95%CI,4.1 个月至 NR)。在铂类适用疾病患者中,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗的 ORR 为 20.3%(95%CI,13.6%-28.5%),纳武利尤单抗的 ORR 为 29.5%(95%CI,18.5%-42.6%)。铂类难治性疾病患者中,纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与纳武利尤单抗相关的 3 级或 4 级治疗相关不良事件发生率分别为 15.8%(25/158)和 14.6%(12/82),铂类适用疾病患者分别为 24.6%(30/122)和 13.1%(8/61)。

结论和相关性:CheckMate 714 随机临床试验未达到其主要终点,即一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗与纳武利尤单抗单药治疗铂类难治性 R/M SCCHN 的 ORR 获益。纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗具有可接受的安全性特征。有必要研究 R/M SCCHN 患者的亚群,以确定哪些患者从纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗治疗中获益,而不是纳武利尤单抗单药治疗。

试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02823574。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad31/10080406/d659a7c4d21d/jamaoncol-e230147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad31/10080406/8d5a2d45cd16/jamaoncol-e230147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad31/10080406/d659a7c4d21d/jamaoncol-e230147-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad31/10080406/8d5a2d45cd16/jamaoncol-e230147-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad31/10080406/d659a7c4d21d/jamaoncol-e230147-g002.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy and Safety of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab Alone for Treatment of Recurrent or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Phase 2 CheckMate 714 Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2023-6-1

[2]
Nivolumab vs Pembrolizumab for Treatment of US Patients With Platinum-Refractory Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Network Meta-analysis and Cost-effectiveness Analysis.

JAMA Netw Open. 2021-5-3

[3]
Adjuvant nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for stage III gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer after gastrectomy with D2 or more extensive lymph-node dissection (ATTRACTION-5): a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024-8

[4]
Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 3 EXTENTORCH Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2025-1-1

[5]
Long-Term Survival Outcomes With First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab-Based Treatment in Patients With Metastatic NSCLC and Tumor Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Lower Than 1%: A Pooled Analysis.

J Thorac Oncol. 2025-1

[6]
Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-12

[7]
Toripalimab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HEPATORCH): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025-7

[8]
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for the treatment of ovarian cancer.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-16

[9]
Eosinophil is a predictor of severe immune-related adverse events induced by ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Front Immunol. 2025-1-9

[10]
Nivolumab for Patients With High-Risk Oral Leukoplakia: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2024-1-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Immunotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer.

Cancer Treat Res. 2025

[2]
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Combination Treatment in Advanced Ovarian and Endometrial Clear Cell Cancers: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Oncol. 2025-7-3

[3]
Disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy based on FAERS database.

Sci Rep. 2025-7-1

[4]
Advances and challenges in immunotherapy in head and neck cancer.

Front Immunol. 2025-6-6

[5]
Lysine-specific demethylase 1 controls key OSCC preneoplasia inducer STAT3 through CDK7 phosphorylation during oncogenic progression and immunosuppression.

Int J Oral Sci. 2025-4-17

[6]
Deciphering T-cell exhaustion in the tumor microenvironment: paving the way for innovative solid tumor therapies.

Front Immunol. 2025-4-1

[7]
Immunotherapeutic strategies in head and neck cancer: challenges and opportunities.

J Clin Invest. 2025-4-15

[8]
Outcomes for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer by HPV status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Oncologist. 2025-4-4

[9]
Differences in PD-L1, PD-L2, and EGFR Expression Between Naive and Recurrent Tumors in Patients With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study.

Head Neck. 2025-8

[10]
Evaluating the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in first and second-line treatments for recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of RCTs with a focus on PD-L1 expression.

Front Immunol. 2025-2-13

本文引用的文献

[1]
Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus EXTREME Regimen as First-Line Treatment for Recurrent/Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: The Final Results of CheckMate 651.

J Clin Oncol. 2023-4-20

[2]
Pembrolizumab With or Without Chemotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Updated Results of the Phase III KEYNOTE-048 Study.

J Clin Oncol. 2023-2-1

[3]
Long-term Outcomes with Nivolumab as First-line Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: Subgroup Analysis of CheckMate 141.

Oncologist. 2022-3-4

[4]
Pembrolizumab Alone or With Chemotherapy for Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in KEYNOTE-048: Subgroup Analysis by Programmed Death Ligand-1 Combined Positive Score.

J Clin Oncol. 2022-7-20

[5]
Influence of tumor mutational burden, inflammatory gene expression profile, and PD-L1 expression on response to pembrolizumab in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

J Immunother Cancer. 2022-2

[6]
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: 3-year outcomes from CheckMate 743.

Ann Oncol. 2022-5

[7]
Nivolumab Combination Therapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.

N Engl J Med. 2022-2-3

[8]
First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Advanced NSCLC: 4-Year Outcomes From the Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 CheckMate 227 Part 1 Trial.

J Thorac Oncol. 2022-2

[9]
TMB and Inflammatory Gene Expression Associated with Clinical Outcomes following Immunotherapy in Advanced Melanoma.

Cancer Immunol Res. 2021-10

[10]
Development and Performance of a CD8 Gene Signature for Characterizing Inflammation in the Tumor Microenvironment across Multiple Tumor Types.

J Mol Diagn. 2021-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索