Research Centre for Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow UK.
Research Centre for Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow UK.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;23(9):e347-e360. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00049-X. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
This systematic review, commissioned and funded by WHO, aimed to update a review of infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions at a national level to inform a review of their IPC Core Components guidelines (PROSPERO CRD42021297376). CENTRAL, CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and WHO IRIS were searched for studies meeting Cochrane's Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) design criteria, published from April 19, 2017, to Oct 14, 2021. Primary research studies examining national IPC interventions in acute hospitals in any country with outcomes related to rates of health-care-associated infections were included. Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed quality using the EPOC risk of bias criteria. 36 studies were categorised per intervention type and synthesised narratively: care bundles (n=2), care bundles with implementation strategies (n=9), IPC programmes (n=16), and regulations (n=9). Designs included 21 interrupted time-series, nine controlled before-and-after studies, four cluster-randomised trials, and two non-randomised trials. Evidence supports the effectiveness of care bundles with implementation strategies. However, evidence for IPC programmes and regulations was inconclusive as studies were heterogeneous regarding populations, interventions, and outcomes. The overall risk of bias was high. Recommendations include the involvement of implementation strategies in care bundles and for further research on national IPC interventions with robust study designs and in low-income and middle-income settings.
本系统评价由世界卫生组织委托并资助,旨在更新国家层面感染预防和控制(IPC)干预措施的评价,为IPC 核心要素指南(PROSPERO CRD42021297376)的评价提供信息。通过 Cochrane 有效实践和组织护理(EPOC)设计标准,对 CENTRAL、CINAHL、Embase、MEDLINE 和世界卫生组织 IRIS 进行了检索,检索时间为 2017 年 4 月 19 日至 2021 年 10 月 14 日,以查找与卫生保健相关感染发生率相关的国家 IPC 干预措施的研究。纳入了在任何国家的急性医院中对国家 IPC 干预措施进行的初级研究,这些研究与与卫生保健相关的感染发生率相关的结局有关。两名独立评审员使用 EPOC 偏倚风险标准提取数据并评估质量。根据干预类型对 36 项研究进行分类,并进行叙述性综合:护理包(n=2)、具有实施策略的护理包(n=9)、IPC 方案(n=16)和法规(n=9)。设计包括 21 项中断时间序列研究、9 项对照前后研究、4 项整群随机试验和 2 项非随机试验。有证据支持具有实施策略的护理包的有效性。然而,IPC 方案和法规的证据尚无定论,因为研究在人群、干预措施和结局方面存在异质性。总体偏倚风险较高。建议包括在护理包中纳入实施策略,并对具有稳健研究设计和在低收入和中等收入国家的国家 IPC 干预措施进行进一步研究。