School of Engineering, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia; Centre for Sustainable Bioproducts, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, 3216, Australia.
School of Electrical, Mechanical and Infrastructure Engineering, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, 3010, Australia.
Chemosphere. 2023 Jul;328:138620. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138620. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
Biochar products that hold and release water within a stable carbonised porous structure provide many opportunities for climate mitigation and a range of applications such as for soil amendments. Biochar that are produced from various organic feedstocks by pyrolysis can provide multiple co-benefits to soil including improving soil health and productivity, pH buffering, contaminant control, nutrient storage, and release, however, there are also risks for biochar application in soils. This study evaluated fundamental biochar properties that influence Water Holding Capacity (WHC) of biochar products and provides recommendations for testing and optimising biochar products prior to soil applications. A total of 21 biochar samples (locally sourced, commercially available, and standard biochars) were characterised for particle properties, salinity, pH and ash content, porosity, and surface area (with N as adsorbate), surface SEM imaging, and several water testing methods. Biochar products with mixed particle size, irregular shapes, and hydrophilic properties were able to rapidly store relatively large volumes of water (up to 400% wt.). In contrast, relatively less water (as low as 78% wt.) was taken up by small-sized biochar products with smooth surfaces, along with hydrophobic biochars that were identified by the water drop penetration test (rather than contact angle test). Water was stored mostly in interpore spaces (between biochar particles) although intra-pore spaces (meso-pore and micropore scale) were also significant for some biochars. The type of organic feedstock did not appear to directly affect water holding, although further work is needed to evaluate mesopore scale processes and pyrolytic conditions that could influence the biochemical and hydrological behaviour of biochar. Biochars with high salinity, and carbon structures that are not alkaline pose potential risks when used as soil amendments.
生物炭产品在稳定的碳化多孔结构中持水和释放水,为气候缓解和一系列应用提供了许多机会,例如土壤改良。通过热解由各种有机原料生产的生物炭可以为土壤提供多种协同效益,包括改善土壤健康和生产力、pH 缓冲、污染物控制、养分储存和释放,但生物炭在土壤中的应用也存在风险。本研究评估了影响生物炭产品持水能力(WHC)的基本生物炭特性,并为生物炭产品在土壤应用前的测试和优化提供了建议。共对 21 种生物炭样品(本地来源、市售和标准生物炭)进行了颗粒特性、盐分、pH 值和灰分含量、孔隙率和表面积(以 N 为吸附剂)、表面扫描电子显微镜成像以及几种水测试方法的表征。具有混合粒径、不规则形状和亲水特性的生物炭产品能够快速储存相对大量的水(高达 400wt%)。相比之下,具有光滑表面的小粒径生物炭产品以及通过水滴渗透试验(而不是接触角试验)识别出的疏水性生物炭仅吸收相对较少的水(低至 78wt%)。水主要储存在孔间空间(生物炭颗粒之间),尽管内孔空间(中孔和微孔尺度)对一些生物炭也很重要。有机原料的类型似乎不会直接影响水的保持,尽管需要进一步的工作来评估可能影响生物炭生化和水文行为的中孔尺度过程和热解条件。用作土壤改良剂时,高盐度和非碱性碳结构的生物炭存在潜在风险。