Gregorius H R, Ziehe M
J Theor Biol. 1986 Jan 7;118(1):115-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(86)80012-1.
Part I of the present series demonstrates that globally stable polymorphic equilibria may show underdominance in Darwinian fitness. Hence, overdominance in fitness can no longer be conceived of as a necessary condition for the stability of a polymorphism. In the present paper, the question is posed as to whether overdominance is at least sufficient for this stability. A population of randomly mating individuals is considered, where selection operates uniquely through differential fecundities of particular mating types and may generate either a heterozygote excess or deficit relative to Hardy-Weinberg proportions. It turns out that both unstable central overdominance and stable central underdominance are possible and that their occurrence is strongly related to an excess or a deficiency of heterozygotes in the vicinity of the regions of instability or stability. As one consequence, the above suggested sufficiency of heterozygote superiority is not valid, even in random mating populations. Based on the results of both papers of this series, which demonstrate the inadequacy of over- and underdominance as indicators of stability or instability, a modified overdominance principle is discussed. This principle states that a biallelic polymorphism is maintained if the heterozygote is superior in its degree of "heterogamous self-replication" to the degrees of "autogamous self-replication" of the corresponding homozygotes. It is derived with the help of fractional fitnesses, and it is pointed out that certain ratios of these may be more useful for finding evolutionary constants which govern the maintenance of genetic polymorphisms than are ratios of total fitnesses.
