El Jurdi Najla, Hoover Alex, O'Leary Daniel, Cao Qing, Gupta Ashish, Ebens Christen, Maakaron Joseph, Betts Brian C, Rashidi Armin, Juckett Mark, Lund Troy, Bachanova Veronika, MacMillan Margaret, Miller Jeffrey, Orchard Paul, Wagner John, Vercellotti Gregory, Weisdorf Daniel, Dusenbery Kathryn, Terezakis Stephanie, Holtan Shernan
Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
medRxiv. 2023 Mar 29:2023.03.24.23287521. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.24.23287521.
Graft-versus host disease (GVHD) is a major limitation to the success of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT). We hypothesized that the GVHD prophylaxis regimen of post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy), tacrolimus (Tac) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) would reduce the incidence of GVHD in patients receiving a matched or single antigen mismatched HCT without an increase in risk of malignant relapse.
This is a phase II study conducted at the University of Minnesota using a myeloablative regimen of either: (A) total body irradiation (TBI, total dose 1320 cGy, administered in 165 cGy fractions, twice a day from days -4 to -1) or (B) Busulfan 3.2mg/kg daily (cumulative AUC 19,000 - 21,000 μmol/min/L) plus fludarabine 160mg/m days -5 to -2, followed by a GVHD prophylaxis regimen of PTCy (50mg/kg days +3 and +4), Tac and MMF (beginning day +5). The primary endpoint is cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression at 1-year post-transplant. We compared results to our previous myeloablative protocol for matched donors utilizing cyclosporine/methotrexate (CSA/MTX) GVHD prophylaxis.
From March 2018 - June 2022, we enrolled and treated 125 pediatric and adult patients with a median follow up of 472 days. Grade II-IV acute GVHD occurred in 16% (95% confidence interval (CI): 9-23%); Grade III-IV acute GVHD was 4% (CI: 0-8%). No patients experienced grade IV GVHD, and there were no deaths due to GVHD before day 100. Only 3 developed chronic GVHD requiring immune suppression, (4%, CI: 0-8%). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 80% (CI: 69-87%), and (graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival) GRFS 57% (CI: 45-67%), both higher than historical CSA/MTX. The incidence of grade II-IV aGVHD, cGVHD, and NRM were all lower with PTCy/Tac/MMF compared to historical CSA/MTX. One-quarter (25%) experienced relapse (CI: 15-36%) similar to historical CSA/MTX. There was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between recipients of matched versus 7/8 donors.
Myeloablative HCT with PTCy/Tac/MMF results in extremely low incidence of severe acute or chronic GVHD, the primary endpoint of this clinical trial. Relapse risk is not increased compared to our historical CSA/MTX cohort.
移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)是异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)成功的主要限制因素。我们假设移植后环磷酰胺(PTCy)、他克莫司(Tac)和霉酚酸酯(MMF)的GVHD预防方案将降低接受匹配或单抗原错配HCT患者的GVHD发生率,且不会增加恶性复发风险。
这是一项在明尼苏达大学进行的II期研究,采用以下清髓方案之一:(A)全身照射(TBI,总剂量1320 cGy,以165 cGy分次给药,从-4天至-1天每天两次)或(B)白消安3.2mg/kg每日(累积AUC 19,000 - 21,000 μmol/min/L)加氟达拉滨160mg/m²从-5天至-2天,随后采用PTCy(50mg/kg第+3天和第+4天)、Tac和MMF(从第+5天开始)的GVHD预防方案。主要终点是移植后1年需要全身免疫抑制的慢性GVHD累积发生率。我们将结果与我们之前使用环孢素/甲氨蝶呤(CSA/MTX)预防GVHD的匹配供体清髓方案进行了比较。
2018年3月至2022年6月,我们招募并治疗了125例儿科和成人患者,中位随访472天。II-IV级急性GVHD发生率为16%(95%置信区间(CI):9 - 23%);III-IV级急性GVHD为4%(CI:0 - 8%)。无患者发生IV级GVHD,且在第100天前无因GVHD死亡。仅3例发生需要免疫抑制的慢性GVHD(4%,CI:0 - 8%)。两年总生存率(OS)为80%(CI:69 - 87%),无移植物抗宿主病、无复发生存率(GRFS)为57%(CI:45 - 67%),均高于既往CSA/MTX方案。与既往CSA/MTX相比,PTCy/Tac/MMF方案的II-IV级aGVHD、cGVHD和非复发死亡率均较低。四分之一(25%)的患者出现复发(CI:15 - 36%),与既往CSA/MTX相似。匹配供体与7/8供体受者的生存结果无统计学显著差异。
采用PTCy/Tac/MMF的清髓性HCT导致严重急性或慢性GVHD的发生率极低,这是该临床试验的主要终点。与我们既往的CSA/MTX队列相比,复发风险未增加。