Howell Julianne W, Hirth Melissa J
Self-employed hand and upper extremity therapy consultant, Saint Joseph, MI, USA.
Occupational Therapy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia; Malvern Hand Therapy, Malvern, Victoria, Australia.
J Hand Ther. 2023 Apr-Jun;36(2):400-413. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Apr 9.
An international survey of therapists cited 2 barriers (physician preference and departmental policy) to the implementation of a relative motion extension (RME) orthosis/early active motion (EAM) approach.
e-survey PURPOSE: To glean insight from hand surgeons and hand therapists regarding their awareness and experiences in implementing or not implementing an RME orthosis/EAM approach for management of finger zones V-VI extensor tendon repairs.
Two e-surveys, one to hand surgeons and the other to hand therapists were distributed. Participants were asked 8-open ended questions with the opportunity for additional comment.
Nine of 11 surgeons and 10 of 11 therapists (clinicians/educators/administrators) who were surveyed, participated. All respondents from 7 countries were aware of the RME/EAM approach, with only 1 surgeon and 2 therapists not implementing. Surgeons once aware, quickly implement; therapists in this survey implemented about 2.5 years after learning of the approach. Surgeon use was influenced more by their peers than the evidence while therapist knowledge came from professional meetings. Therapists teaching at university-level and continuing education integrate the approach.
Although the RME orthosis/EAM approach has been around for 4 decades, awareness for the hand surgeons and therapists surveyed has only been over the past 20 years. Surveyed surgeons like to visualize how the RME concept works and therapists depend more on the evidence. To overcome barriers to RME/EAM implementation, several strategies are outlined.
Although a small survey, valuable comments provide insight for addressing the previously cited barriers. Strategies for increasing awareness and fostering implementation of an RME orthosis/EAM approach are offered by international hand surgeons and therapists surveyed regarding the commonly cited barriers of surgeon preference and department procedures.
一项针对治疗师的国际调查指出,在实施相对运动伸展(RME)支具/早期主动运动(EAM)方法时存在两个障碍(医生偏好和部门政策)。
电子调查
从手外科医生和手部治疗师那里收集关于他们在实施或不实施RME支具/EAM方法来管理手指V - VI区伸肌腱修复方面的认识和经验的见解。
分发了两份电子调查问卷,一份给手外科医生,另一份给手部治疗师。参与者被问到8个开放式问题,并可发表额外评论。
接受调查的11名外科医生中有9名以及11名治疗师(临床医生/教育工作者/管理人员)中有10名参与了调查。来自7个国家的所有受访者都了解RME/EAM方法,只有1名外科医生和2名治疗师未实施。外科医生一旦了解,会迅速实施;本次调查中的治疗师在了解该方法约2.5年后实施。外科医生的使用更多地受到同行而非证据的影响,而治疗师的知识来自专业会议。在大学层面授课和继续教育的治疗师会采用该方法。
尽管RME支具/EAM方法已经存在了40年,但接受调查的手外科医生和治疗师只是在过去20年才开始了解。接受调查的外科医生喜欢直观地了解RME概念的工作原理,而治疗师则更多地依赖证据。为克服RME/EAM实施的障碍,概述了几种策略。
尽管是一项小型调查,但宝贵的意见为解决先前提到的障碍提供了见解。接受调查的国际手外科医生和治疗师针对常见的医生偏好和部门程序障碍,提供了提高对RME支具/EAM方法的认识并促进其实施的策略。