Hu Jin-Hui, Xue Li-Hong, Qian Cong, Xue Li-Xiang, Cao Shuai
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2023 Apr 8;44(4):2348-2355. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202204079.
Straw returning is of great significance for improving soil structure, soil fertility, crop yield, and quality. However, straw returning causes environmental problems such as increased methane emission and non-point source pollutant emission risk. How to reduce the negative effects of straw returning is an urgent problem to be solved.In this study, the effects of aerobic treatment on carbon and nitrogen concentration in surface water and greenhouse gas emissions in paddy fields with different treatments of straw returning were systematically compared.The results showed that different treatments of straw returning significantly increased chemical oxygen demand (COD) in the surface water of the paddy field and significantly promoted the methane emission of the rice field and the global warming potential (GWP), although it slightly reduced NO emission. The increasing trends showed that wheat straw returning>rape straw>broad bean straw returning.Straw returning increased rice yield when compared with the control without straw returning, but the difference was not significant. Aerobic treatment reduced the COD in surface water by 15%-32%, the methane emission of the paddy field by 10.4%-24.8%, and the GWP of paddy field by 9.7%-24.4% under different straw returning treatments, without affecting the rice yield. The mitigation effect of aerobic treatment with wheat straw returning was the best. The results indicated the potential of oxygenation measures in greenhouse gas emission mitigation and COD emission risk reduction in straw returning paddy fields, especially in wheat straw returning paddy fields.
秸秆还田对于改善土壤结构、土壤肥力、作物产量和品质具有重要意义。然而,秸秆还田会引发一些环境问题,如甲烷排放量增加和非点源污染物排放风险。如何降低秸秆还田的负面影响是亟待解决的问题。在本研究中,系统比较了好氧处理对不同秸秆还田处理的稻田地表水碳氮浓度及温室气体排放的影响。结果表明,不同的秸秆还田处理显著增加了稻田地表水中的化学需氧量(COD),显著促进了稻田甲烷排放及全球变暖潜势(GWP),尽管其略微降低了一氧化氮排放。增加趋势表现为小麦秸秆还田>油菜秸秆>蚕豆秸秆还田。与不进行秸秆还田的对照相比,秸秆还田提高了水稻产量,但差异不显著。在不同秸秆还田处理下,好氧处理使地表水COD降低了15% - 32%,稻田甲烷排放降低了10.4% - 24.8%,稻田GWP降低了9.7% - 24.4%,且不影响水稻产量。小麦秸秆还田的好氧处理缓解效果最佳。结果表明了充氧措施在减轻秸秆还田稻田温室气体排放及降低COD排放风险方面的潜力,尤其是在小麦秸秆还田的稻田中。