Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS. †Drs Bridges and Rampon contributed equally to this study.
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS.
Fam Med. 2023 Apr;55(4):217-224. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2023.581155. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
The influence of racism in medicine is increasingly acknowledged, and the negative effect of systemic racism on individual and population health is well established. Yet, little is known about how or whether medical students are being educated on this topic. This study investigated the presence and features of curricula related to systemic racism in North American family medicine clerkships.
We conducted a survey of North American family medicine clerkship directors as part of the 2021 Council of Academic Family Medicine's Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey.
The survey response rate was 49% (78/160). Almost all clerkship directors agreed (n=68; 97.1%) that teaching about racism at all levels of medical education was appropriate. Yet, 60% (n=42) of family medicine clerkship directors reported no formalized curriculum for teaching about racism or bias. Teaching about systemic racism was more likely to be present in the family medicine clerkship at institutions where clerkship directors reported that faculty receive 5 or more hours of training in racism and bias, as compared to institutions where faculty receive 4 or fewer hours of training in racism/bias (odds ratio 2.82, 95% CI 1.05-8.04, P=.045). Programs reported using racism in medicine curricula based in cultural competency (20%); structural competency (10%); both cultural and structural competency (31%); and neither or uncertain (40%). Clerkship directors reported high faculty, student, and institutional engagement in addressing systemic racism. We did not find an association between underrepresented in medicine director identity and racism curricula.
In more than half of family medicine clerkships, systemic racism is not addressed, despite interest from students and institutional support. A higher number of hours of faculty training time on the topic of racism was associated with having a systemic racism module in the clerkship curriculum, but we lacked data to identify a causal relationship. Investments in faculty development to teach systemic racism, including discussion of structural competency, are needed.
医学领域中的种族主义影响日益受到关注,系统性种族主义对个人和人群健康的负面影响也已得到充分证实。然而,人们对于医学生是否以及如何接受这一主题的教育知之甚少。本研究旨在调查北美家庭医学实习课程中与系统性种族主义相关的课程的存在和特点。
我们对北美家庭医学实习主任进行了一项调查,该调查是 2021 年学术家庭医学理事会教育研究联盟(CERA)调查的一部分。
调查的回复率为 49%(78/160)。几乎所有实习主任(n=68;97.1%)都认为在医学教育的各个层次教授种族主义都是合适的。然而,60%(n=42)的家庭医学实习主任报告说没有针对种族主义或偏见进行教学的正规课程。在那些报告说教员接受 5 小时或以上关于种族主义和偏见的培训的机构中,家庭医学实习中更有可能教授系统性种族主义,而在那些教员接受 4 小时或更少关于种族主义/偏见培训的机构中则不然(比值比 2.82,95%置信区间 1.05-8.04,P=.045)。报告使用基于文化能力(20%)、结构能力(10%)、文化和结构能力(31%)以及两者都不使用或不确定(40%)的医学中的种族主义课程。实习主任报告说,教员、学生和机构都积极参与解决系统性种族主义问题。我们没有发现医学领域代表性不足的主任身份与种族主义课程之间存在关联。
尽管学生和机构都支持,但在超过一半的家庭医学实习中,没有涉及系统性种族主义。教员在种族主义主题上的培训时间越多,实习课程中就越有可能有系统性种族主义模块,但我们缺乏数据来确定因果关系。需要投资于教员发展,以教授系统性种族主义,包括讨论结构能力。