Glomb Nicolaus W, Trivedi Tarak, Grupp-Phelan Jacqueline, Schriger David L, Sporer Karl
Division of Emergency Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco California USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine University of California, Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Apr 9;4(2):e12930. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12930. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Pediatric patients with behavioral health emergencies (BHEs) are often transported to an emergency department (ED) by emergency medical services (EMS), despite having no physical medical complaints, to await psychiatric evaluation and treatment. This process leads to significant delays in their care. We examined the safety of directly transporting pediatric patients with BHEs from the field to an alternative destination of a psychiatric emergency service (PES) facility using an EMS protocol.
A retrospective review from November 1, 2011, to November 1, 2016, was conducted for pediatric EMS encounters using EMS data from Alameda County, California. Our primary outcome was the safety of a prehospital alternative destination protocol. We identified the proportion of patients who required retransport to an ED within 24 h after arriving at PES (defined as a failed diversion). We also describe the mortality of all patients being transported for a BHE.
There were 38,241 total pediatric encounters, with 20.1% for BHEs. A total of 3122 (41%) BHE encounters met protocol criteria and were transported directly to the PES. Only 16 (0.5%) patients had a secondary transport (failed diversion) to an ED within 24 h of arrival. No patients with a BHE transported to the PES died within 30 days of the EMS encounter.
Death and adverse clinical outcomes are extremely rare in pediatric patients using a prehospital alternative destination protocol. This information could significantly improve the care of children with BHEs.
患有行为健康紧急情况(BHE)的儿科患者通常由紧急医疗服务(EMS)转运至急诊科(ED),尽管他们没有身体方面的医疗主诉,而是等待精神科评估和治疗。这一过程导致他们的治疗出现显著延误。我们使用EMS协议,研究了将患有BHE的儿科患者从现场直接转运至精神科紧急服务(PES)机构这一替代目的地的安全性。
利用加利福尼亚州阿拉米达县的EMS数据,对2011年11月1日至2016年11月1日期间儿科EMS接诊情况进行回顾性分析。我们的主要结局是院前替代目的地协议的安全性。我们确定了到达PES后24小时内需再次转运至ED的患者比例(定义为分流失败)。我们还描述了所有因BHE被转运患者的死亡率。
儿科接诊总数为38241例,其中BHE占20.1%。共有3122例(41%)BHE接诊符合协议标准并被直接转运至PES。只有16例(0.5%)患者在到达后24小时内被二次转运(分流失败)至ED。没有BHE患者在EMS接诊后30天内死亡。
使用院前替代目的地协议的儿科患者中,死亡和不良临床结局极为罕见。这一信息可显著改善患有BHE儿童的治疗。