Suppr超能文献

孕周≤32周且出生体重≤1250克的早产儿三种喂养方式的比较:一项随机对照试验

Comparison of Three Modalities of Feeding in Preterm Infants ≤32 Weeks and ≤1,250 G: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kumar Vijay, Thakur Anup, Garg Pankaj, Kler Neelam

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Department of Neonatology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1792-e1799. doi: 10.1055/a-2074-1960. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Early establishment of enteral feeds is desirable in very preterm infants, but it may be associated with feeding intolerance. Several feeding methods have been studied with no strong evidence to suggest the preferred feeding method to establish early full enteral feeds. We studied three modalities of feeding in preterm infants ≤32 weeks and ≤1,250 g: continuous infusion (CI), intermittent bolus by infusion (IBI), and intermittent bolus by gravity (IBG) for their effect on time to reach full enteral feeds of 180 mL/kg/d.

STUDY DESIGN

We randomized 146 infants, 49 infants in each CI and IBI group and 48 infants in the IBG group. In the CI group, feeds were delivered by an infusion pump continuously over 24 hours. In the IBI group, feeds were given every 2 hours and infused over 15 minutes by an infusion pump. In the IBG group, feeds were delivered by gravity over 10 to 30 minutes. The intervention was continued till infants reached direct breast/cup feeds.

RESULTS

The mean (standard deviation) gestation in CI, IBI, and IBG groups were 28.4 (2.2), 28.5(1.9), and 28.6 (1.8) weeks, respectively. The time to reach full feeds in CI, IBI, and IBG were not significantly different (median [interquartile range]: 13 [10-16], 11.5 [9-17], and 13 [9.5-14.2] d, respectively,  = 0.71). The proportions of infants who developed feeding intolerance in CI, IBI, and IBG were similar ( [%]: 21 [51.2%], 20 [52.6%], and 22 [64.7%], respectively,  = 0.45). There was no difference in necrotizing enterocolitis ≥2 ( = 0.80), bronchopulmonary dysplasia ( = 0.86), intraventricular hemorrhage ≥2 ( = 0.35), patent ductus arteriosus requiring treatment ( = 0.44), retinopathy of prematurity requiring treatment ( = 0.51), and growth parameters at discharge.

CONCLUSION

In preterm infants, ≤32 weeks of gestation and birth weight ≤1,250 g, there was no difference in time to reach full enteral feeds in the three modalities of feeding. This study is registered with Clinical Trials Registry India (CTRI) and the registration number is CTRI/2017/06/008792.

KEY POINTS

· Gavage feeding in preterm infants is either continuous or intermittent bolus feeding.. · Intermittent bolus feeding was evaluated in a controlled time by infusion over 15 minutes.. · The time to reach full feeds was comparable for all three methods..

摘要

目的

极早产儿尽早建立肠内喂养是可取的,但这可能与喂养不耐受有关。已经研究了几种喂养方法,但没有强有力的证据表明哪种喂养方法是建立早期全肠内喂养的首选方法。我们研究了胎龄≤32周、出生体重≤1250g的早产儿的三种喂养方式:持续输注(CI)、输液泵间歇推注(IBI)和重力间歇推注(IBG),观察它们对达到180mL/kg/d全肠内喂养时间的影响。

研究设计

我们将146名婴儿随机分组,CI组和IBI组各49名婴儿,IBG组48名婴儿。CI组通过输液泵在24小时内持续输注喂养。IBI组每2小时喂养一次,通过输液泵在15分钟内输注。IBG组通过重力在10至30分钟内输注。干预持续到婴儿能够直接进行母乳喂养/杯喂。

结果

CI组、IBI组和IBG组的平均(标准差)胎龄分别为28.4(2.2)周、28.5(1.9)周和28.6(1.8)周。CI组、IBI组和IBG组达到全量喂养的时间无显著差异(中位数[四分位间距]:分别为13[10 - 16]天、11.5[9 - 17]天和13[9.5 - 14.2]天,P = 0.71)。CI组、IBI组和IBG组发生喂养不耐受的婴儿比例相似(百分比:分别为21[51.2%]、20[52.6%]和22[64.7%],P = 0.45)。在≥2期坏死性小肠结肠炎(P = 0.80)、支气管肺发育不良(P = 0.86)、≥2级脑室内出血(P = 0.35)、需要治疗的动脉导管未闭(P = 0.44)、需要治疗的早产儿视网膜病变(P = 0.51)以及出院时的生长参数方面,各组之间没有差异。

结论

对于胎龄≤32周、出生体重≤1250g的早产儿,三种喂养方式达到全肠内喂养的时间没有差异。本研究已在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)注册,并获得注册号CTRI/2017/06/008792。

要点

· 早产儿管饲喂养分为持续或间歇推注喂养。· 间歇推注喂养通过输液泵在15分钟的控制时间内进行评估。· 三种方法达到全量喂养的时间相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验