• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从左心室心尖部探讨室性心律失常患者的心电图和电生理参数与左心室功能的关系。

Insight of electrocardiographic and electrophysiological parameters on the left ventricular function in patients with ventricular arrhythmia from left ventricular summit.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Institute of Clinical Medicine and Cardiovascular Research Institute, National Yang-Ming Chiao-Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 May;34(5):1230-1240. doi: 10.1111/jce.15904. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1111/jce.15904
PMID:37061887
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) commonly originate from the left ventricular summit (LVS) and results in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in some patients; however, factors related to LV cardiomyopathy have not been well elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the risk factors for LV cardiomyopathy and the outcomes of patients with LVS VA.

METHODS

Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 139 patients (60.7% men; mean age 53.2 ± 13.9 years old) underwent catheter ablation for LVS VA in two centers. Detailed patient demographics, electrocardiograms, electrophysiological characteristics, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. LV cardiomyopathy was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%.

RESULTS

Acute procedural success was achieved in 92.8% of patients. There were 40 patients (28.8%) with LV cardiomyopathy, and the mean LVEF improved from 37.5 ± 9.3% to 48.5 ± 10.2% after ablation (p < .001). After multivariate analysis, the independent factors of LV dysfunction were wider QRS duration (QRSd) of the VA (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.04; p = .046) and the absolute earliest activation time discrepancy (AEAD) between epicardium and endocardium (OR 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00-1.09; p = .048). After ablation, the LV function was completely recovered in 20 patients (50%). The factors for LV dysfunction without recovery included wider premature ventricular complex (PVC) QRSd (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17; p = .012) and poorer LVEF (OR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = .020).

CONCLUSION

In patients with VA from the LVS, PVC QRSd and AEAD are factors associated with deteriorating LV systolic function. Catheter ablation can reverse LV remodeling. Narrower QRSd and better LVEF are associated with better recovery of LV function after ablation.

摘要

引言

室性心律失常(VA)通常起源于左心室顶(LVS),并在某些患者中导致左心室(LV)功能障碍;然而,与 LV 心肌病相关的因素尚未得到充分阐明。因此,本研究旨在探讨 LV 心肌病的危险因素以及 LVS VA 患者的预后。

方法

在 2013 年至 2018 年间,共有 139 名患者(60.7%为男性;平均年龄 53.2±13.9 岁)在两个中心接受了 LVS VA 的导管消融治疗。分析了详细的患者人口统计学、心电图、电生理特征和临床结果。LV 心肌病的定义为左心室射血分数(LVEF)<50%。

结果

92.8%的患者获得了急性手术成功。有 40 名(28.8%)患者患有 LV 心肌病,消融后平均 LVEF 从 37.5±9.3%提高到 48.5±10.2%(p<0.001)。多因素分析后,VA 较宽的 QRS 时限(QRSd)(比值比 [OR] 1.02;95%置信区间 [CI]:1.00-1.04;p=0.046)和心外膜与心内膜之间绝对最早激活时间差异(AEAD)(OR 1.05;95%CI:1.00-1.09;p=0.048)是 LV 功能障碍的独立危险因素。消融后,20 名患者(50%)的 LV 功能完全恢复。LV 功能无恢复的因素包括较宽的室性期前收缩(PVC)QRSd(OR 1.09;95%CI:1.02-1.17;p=0.012)和较差的 LVEF(OR 0.85;95%CI:0.74-0.97;p=0.020)。

结论

在源自 LVS 的 VA 患者中,PVC QRSd 和 AEAD 是与 LV 收缩功能恶化相关的因素。导管消融可逆转 LV 重构。较窄的 QRSd 和较好的 LVEF 与消融后 LV 功能的更好恢复相关。

相似文献

1
Insight of electrocardiographic and electrophysiological parameters on the left ventricular function in patients with ventricular arrhythmia from left ventricular summit.从左心室心尖部探讨室性心律失常患者的心电图和电生理参数与左心室功能的关系。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023 May;34(5):1230-1240. doi: 10.1111/jce.15904. Epub 2023 Apr 16.
2
Coupling interval dispersion and body mass index are independent predictors of idiopathic premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy.耦合间期离散度和体重指数是特发性室性早搏诱发心肌病的独立预测因素。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014 Jul;25(7):756-62. doi: 10.1111/jce.12391. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
3
Recovery from left ventricular dysfunction after ablation of frequent premature ventricular complexes.频发室性早搏消融后左心室功能的恢复。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Feb;10(2):172-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.10.011. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Post-Extrasystolic Potentiation as a Predictor of Recovery of Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation.电生理射频消融术后电交替后增强作为左心室功能障碍恢复的预测指标。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;3(11):1283-1291. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.05.017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
5
Ventricular Ectopy in the Context of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Risk Factors and Outcomes Following Catheter Ablation.左心室收缩功能障碍背景下的室性早搏:导管消融后的危险因素及预后
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Mar;28(3):379-388. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.01.012. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
6
Clinical recognition of pure premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy at presentation.临床识别初发时单纯室性早搏致心肌病。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec;14(12):1864-1870. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.025. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Influence of baseline QRS on the left ventricular ejection fraction recovery after frequent premature ventricular complex ablation.基线QRS对频发室性早搏消融术后左心室射血分数恢复的影响。
Europace. 2020 Feb 1;22(2):274-280. doi: 10.1093/europace/euz330.
8
The effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation of frequent premature ventricular complexes and arrhythmia burden on left ventricular function.射频导管消融频繁室性早搏及心律失常负荷对左心室功能的影响。
Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(7):698-704. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0058.
9
Reversal of outflow tract ventricular premature depolarization-induced cardiomyopathy with ablation: effect of residual arrhythmia burden and preexisting cardiomyopathy on outcome.消融治疗流出道室性期前收缩致心肌病的逆转动脉:残余心律失常负荷和预先存在的心肌病对结果的影响。
Heart Rhythm. 2011 Oct;8(10):1608-14. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.04.026. Epub 2011 May 3.
10
Reversal of premature ventricular complexes induced cardiomyopathy. Influence of concomitant structural heart disease.室性早搏诱发的心肌病的逆转。合并结构性心脏病的影响。
Indian Heart J. 2018 May-Jun;70(3):410-415. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.08.025. Epub 2017 Sep 1.