Department of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e876-e896. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.037. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
Craniopharyngioma treatment often necessitates surgical resection. Conventional approaches, such as transcranial and transsphenoidal approaches, are predominantly used. However, a recently adopted supraorbital approach may be more efficacious. Thus, this meta-analysis and systematic review aimed to compare the efficacy of the transcranial, transsphenoidal, and supraorbital approaches for resection and treatment of craniopharyngiomas.
This study was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Analyses were performed according to study design: (1) analyses for studies comparing several surgical approaches; and (2) analyses of all included studies. Random effects meta-analysis models were used to pool odds ratios among studies comparing several approaches. Similarly, categorical meta-regression models were used to examine the effect of surgical approach as a covariate of outcome data for all studies. Statistics were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software (CMA 3.3, Biostat, Englewood, NJ) (significance set at P < 0.05).
Patients were well-matched for age, sex, and preoperative comorbidities between groups stratified by surgical approach. Analyses including 22 studies that compared several approaches demonstrated that the transsphenoidal group had a greater occurrence of postoperative visual improvement (P < 0.0001), lesser occurrence of visual deterioration (P < 0.0001), and lower tumor recurrence rate (P = 0.015) compared with the transcranial group. Only 2 studies compared the supraorbital approach to another approach, limiting analyses. Analyses including all studies demonstrated that the supraorbital group did not differ to either the transcranial or transsphenoidal group for any examined variables.
The present study suggests that the transsphenoidal approach is associated with improved clinical outcomes for craniopharyngioma resection. There are limited data regarding the supraorbital approach, warranting future investigation.
颅咽管瘤的治疗常需手术切除。传统的手术入路,如经颅和经蝶窦入路,应用广泛。然而,最近采用的眶上锁孔入路可能更有效。因此,本项荟萃分析和系统评价旨在比较经颅、经蝶窦和眶上锁孔入路切除和治疗颅咽管瘤的疗效。
本研究遵循 PRISMA 指南进行。根据研究设计进行分析:(1)比较几种手术入路的研究分析;(2)所有纳入研究的分析。比较几种入路的研究中采用随机效应荟萃分析模型来汇总优势比。同样,使用分类荟萃回归模型来检查手术入路作为所有研究的结果数据的协变量的影响。使用 Comprehensive Meta-Analysis 软件(CMA 3.3,Biostat,Englewood,NJ)进行统计学分析(显著性水平设为 P < 0.05)。
根据手术入路分层的患者在年龄、性别和术前合并症方面匹配良好。包括 22 项比较几种入路的研究的分析表明,与经颅组相比,经蝶窦组术后视力改善的发生率更高(P < 0.0001),视力恶化的发生率更低(P < 0.0001),肿瘤复发率更低(P = 0.015)。只有 2 项研究比较了眶上锁孔入路与另一种入路,限制了分析。包括所有研究的分析表明,眶上锁孔组与经颅或经蝶窦组在任何检查变量上均无差异。
本研究表明,经蝶窦入路与颅咽管瘤切除的临床结果改善相关。眶上锁孔入路的数据有限,需要进一步研究。