• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的衰弱患者药物精简:一项定性访谈研究和合作模式建议。

Person-centred deprescribing for patients living with frailty: a qualitative interview study and proposal of a collaborative model.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

出版信息

Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 May 7;31(3):282-289. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad016.

DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riad016
PMID:37068006
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) Present deprescribing experiences of patients living with frailty, their informal carers and healthcare professionals; (2) interpret whether their experiences are reflective of person-centred/collaborative care; (3) complement our findings with existing evidence to present a model for person-centred deprescribing for patients living with frailty, based on a previous collaborative care model.

METHODS

Qualitative design in English primary care (general practice). Semi-structured interviews were undertaken immediately post-deprescribing and 5/6 weeks later with nine patients aged 65+ living with frailty and three informal carers of patients living with frailty. Fourteen primary care professionals with experience in deprescribing were also interviewed. In total, 38 interviews were conducted. A two-staged approach to data analysis was undertaken.

KEY FINDINGS

Three themes were developed: attitudes, beliefs and understanding of medicines management and responsibility; attributes of a collaborative, person-centred deprescribing consultation; organisational factors to support person-centred deprescribing. Based on these findings and complementary to existing evidence, we offer a model for person-centred deprescribing for patients living with frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Previous models of deprescribing for patients living with frailty while, of value, do not consider the contextual factors that govern the implementation and success of models in practice. In this paper, we propose a novel person-centred model for deprescribing for people living with frailty, based on our own empirical findings, and the wider evidence base.

摘要

目的

(1) 介绍患有衰弱症的患者、他们的非正式照顾者和医疗保健专业人员的减药经验;(2) 解释这些经验是否反映了以患者为中心/协作式护理;(3) 用现有证据补充我们的发现,根据之前的协作式护理模式,为患有衰弱症的患者提出以患者为中心的减药模型。

方法

在英国初级保健(全科医疗)中采用定性设计。在减药后立即和 5/6 周后,对 9 名年龄在 65 岁以上患有衰弱症的患者和 3 名患有衰弱症患者的非正式照顾者进行了半结构化访谈。还对 14 名有减药经验的初级保健专业人员进行了访谈。总共进行了 38 次访谈。采用两阶段数据分析方法。

主要发现

制定了三个主题:对药物管理和责任的态度、信念和理解;协作式、以患者为中心的减药咨询的属性;支持以患者为中心的减药的组织因素。基于这些发现和对现有证据的补充,我们为患有衰弱症的患者提供了以患者为中心的减药模型。

结论

以前针对患有衰弱症的患者的减药模型虽然有价值,但没有考虑到影响模型在实践中实施和成功的背景因素。在本文中,我们根据自己的实证发现和更广泛的证据基础,为患有衰弱症的人提出了一种新颖的以患者为中心的减药模型。

相似文献

1
Person-centred deprescribing for patients living with frailty: a qualitative interview study and proposal of a collaborative model.以患者为中心的衰弱患者药物精简:一项定性访谈研究和合作模式建议。
Int J Pharm Pract. 2023 May 7;31(3):282-289. doi: 10.1093/ijpp/riad016.
2
Barriers and facilitators of successful deprescribing as described by older patients living with frailty, their informal carers and clinicians: a qualitative interview study.衰弱老年人、其非正式照护者和临床医生描述的成功减药的障碍和促进因素:一项定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 28;12(3):e054279. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054279.
3
Co-designing an intervention to improve the process of deprescribing for older people living with frailty in the United Kingdom.共同设计一项干预措施,以改善英国衰弱老年人减药过程。
Health Expect. 2023 Feb;26(1):399-408. doi: 10.1111/hex.13669. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
"Starting to think that way from the start": approaching deprescribing decision-making for people accessing palliative care - a qualitative exploration of healthcare professionals views.“从一开始就那样想”:对接受姑息治疗的人群进行逐渐减药决策——对医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探索。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Sep 6;23(1):221. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01523-2.
5
What makes a multidisciplinary medication review and deprescribing intervention for older people work well in primary care? A realist review and synthesis.多学科药物审查和减少老年人用药干预措施在初级保健中为何能良好运行?一项实际审查和综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 25;23(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04256-8.
6
Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment.降压药物停药偏好研究:临床医生、护理人员和痴呆症患者的离散选择实验。
Age Ageing. 2023 Aug 1;52(8). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad153.
7
Exploration of home care nurse's experiences in deprescribing of medications: a qualitative descriptive study.居家护理护士在药物减量方面的经验探索:一项定性描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 24;9(5):e025606. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025606.
8
"… Above All, It's a Matter of  This Person's Quality of Life": Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Deprescribing in Older Patients With Limited Life Expectancy.“……最重要的是,这关乎这个人的生活质量”:医护专业人员对预期寿命有限的老年患者减药的看法。
Gerontologist. 2020 Apr 2;60(3):439-449. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz116.
9
Determinants of implementing deprescribing for older adults in English care homes: a qualitative interview study.实施老年患者在英国家庭护理机构中减药方案的决定因素:定性访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 23;13(11):e081305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081305.
10
Factors influencing deprescribing in primary care for those towards the end of life: A qualitative interview study with patients and healthcare practitioners.影响生命终末期人群在基层医疗中减药的因素:一项对患者和医疗保健从业者的定性访谈研究。
Palliat Med. 2024 Sep;38(8):884-892. doi: 10.1177/02692163241261202. Epub 2024 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Access to Medications for Diabetes Mellitus in the Era of 340B Drug Pricing Program Restrictions: A Bilingual Qualitative Study of Patients' Perspectives.在340B药品定价计划限制时代探索糖尿病药物获取途径:一项关于患者观点的双语定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09795-x.
2
Communication Processes Related to Decision-Making in Medication Management Between Healthcare Providers, Older People and Their Carers: A Systematic Review.医疗保健提供者、老年人及其护理人员之间药物管理决策相关的沟通流程:一项系统综述
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70252. doi: 10.1111/hex.70252.
3
Barriers to person-centered service design in pharmacy practice: examples, lessons, and potential solutions.
药学实践中以患者为中心的服务设计障碍:实例、经验教训和潜在解决方案。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):542-547. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01689-4. Epub 2024 Jan 9.